The purposes of this study were to investigate problem solving and critical thinking of fourth-grade students who were given Problem-Based Learning (PBL) instruction compared to students who were given a more traditional non-PBL instruction. Four classes of students were selected from a public elementary school in Tau-Yuan county and classes were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n=65) and two control groups (n=65) to implement PBL and lecture-based teaching respectively. The groups of students were tested by the Test of Problem-Solving, Cornell Critical Thinking Test (Level X) and the results from paired t-tests showed that the means of posttests in these two tests for experimental group students were significantly better than those of pretests (p<.010). One-way analysis of covariance found significant differences between the means of posttests in these two tests for experimental group students and control groups (p<.050). These findings suggested that PBL promoted the problem solving and critical thinking abilities of fourth graders. Evidence derived from the qualitative data analysis found that the experimental groups brainstormed the various causes of problems and exercisable problem-solving methods according to the problem scenarios. They reflected how to improve and resolve the difficulties they suffered when designing experiments and determining learning issues. They also actively confirm the reliability of the data collected from different sources and made deductive reasoning based upon the data. These findings suggested PBL was beneficial for fourth graders to develop their competency of problem solving and critical thinking.
The purposes of this study were to investigate problem solving and critical thinking of fourth-grade students who were given Problem-Based Learning (PBL) instruction compared to students who were given a more traditional non-PBL instruction. Four classes of students were selected from a public elementary school in Tau-Yuan county and classes were randomly divided into two experimental groups (n=65) and two control groups (n=65) to implement PBL and lecture-based teaching respectively. The groups of students were tested by the Test of Problem-Solving, Cornell Critical Thinking Test (Level X) and the results from paired t-tests showed that the means of posttests in these two tests for experimental group students were significantly better than those of pretests (p<.010). One-way analysis of covariance found significant differences between the means of posttests in these two tests for experimental group students and control groups (p<.050). These findings suggested that PBL promoted the problem solving and critical thinking abilities of fourth graders. Evidence derived from the qualitative data analysis found that the experimental groups brainstormed the various causes of problems and exercisable problem-solving methods according to the problem scenarios. They reflected how to improve and resolve the difficulties they suffered when designing experiments and determining learning issues. They also actively confirm the reliability of the data collected from different sources and made deductive reasoning based upon the data. These findings suggested PBL was beneficial for fourth graders to develop their competency of problem solving and critical thinking.