並列摘要
While complexity is a normal feature of evolving systems (e.g., cosmic, biological, intellectual, political, technological), efforts to assess the future of humanity are often confounded by the complexity of global civilization. This article takes a bird's eye view of all evolving systems to see them as coevolving. This view enables identification of symmetrical processes of system change and transformation, which contextualizes complexity. These symmetrical processes are then mapped onto humanity's evolutionary journey-defined as a sociopolitical system-to locate the current period of the human journey and assess the probable alternation future destination or options. The result is an ability to identify options offering the greatest benefit for humanity-maximizing our evolvability-and thus indicate, which way is up?
並列關鍵字
無資料被引用紀錄
延伸閱讀
- W. V. O. Quine（1973）。On What is there?。哲學論集，(2)，29-51。https://doi.org/10.29699/FJPS.197306.0006
- 張益昇（2011）。We Can Only Toward That Road。藝術欣賞，7(1)，62-66。https://doi.org/10.29479/AA.201102.0013
- 黃瀚賢（2015）。One Step Further。志為護理-慈濟護理雜誌，14(3)，56-57。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=16831624-201506-201506300001-201506300001-56-57
- Faro, S. (1997). Directions. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1997(), 1-1. https://doi.org/10.1155/S106474499700001X
- Lam, H. C. (2006). Who makes the decision? [master's thesis, The University of Hong Kong]. Airiti Library. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0029-1812201200018065