學校領導實務的探究：應關注的對象層級與發展途徑

A Study on School Leadership Practices: The Object Level of Caring and the Approach of Development

連俊智(Jun-Zhi Lian)

《新竹教育大學教育學報》 25卷1期 (2008/06) Pp. 53-78

https://doi.org/10.7044/NHCUEA.200806.0053

摘要

不同的典範產生不同的哲學預設，在教育行政的應用上，會形成不同的組織經營型態、以及不同的問題解決機制。而研究若是一味偏向驗證性的實證探討，對實際工作的幫助將很有限。本文實地進入學校場域，以質性研究觀點，探討在學領導實務中應關注的對象與發展途徑。研究發現，學校領導實務中所涉及的對象是包含了個人、社群、學校與社區、外在環境等多元層級的概念化。而在發展途徑探究上，則必須採取同時關注跨越結構、尋求象徵意義、發展專業與學習、平衡微觀政治、以及發揮影響力等整合觀點。

關鍵字

學校領導實務 ； 質性研究 ； 學校校長

並列摘要

A different paradigm will result in divers hypotheses, and forms a different pattern of organization management and the solving mechanism of different problems in education administration. The result would be limited for the assistance of practice job, if the studies always adopted quantitative resarch. This paper utilized the viewpoint of qualitative research in the field of schools, and explored the object level of caring and the approach of development. This paper found the conceptualization of the multi-level of caring object related to individual, community, school and community, and environment outside. On the other hand, this paper found that the approach of development utilized an integrative viewpoint including crossing structure, finding symbol, developing profession, balancing micropolitics, and accruing influence.

並列關鍵字

school leadership practices ； qualitative research ； school principal

參考文獻

Barth, R. S.(2001).Learning by heart.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.

Bennis, W.,Nanus, B.(1985).Leaders: The strategies for taking charge.New York:Harper & Row.

Bennis, W.(2000).Old dogs, new tricks.London:Kogan Page.

Bolman, L. G.,Deal, T. E.(1991).Leadership and management effectiveness: A multi-frame, multi sector analysis.Human Resource Management.30,509-534.

Bolman, L. G.,Deal, T. E.(1997).Reframing Organizations.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.