透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.116.183
  • 期刊

體系性宗教(際)詮釋學之宗教倫理及價值規範向度基本問題初探

A Preliminary Study on the Basic Issues of the Religious Ethics and Dimension of Value Norms in Systematic Hermeneutics of (Inter) Religion

摘要


宗教之為人類文化之基源本為倫理價值規範之緣起,但在所謂Euthyphron兩難或悖論下,宗教之價值規範系統與倫理道德之自律哲思間產生宗教與倫理孰為根本之問題。本文將從體系性宗教(際)詮釋學出發重新省思該弔詭乃至提示其出路,進而揭櫫對於宗教倫理及價值規範向度三基本問題之初步回應。因此本文需先精義地呈現體系性宗教(際)詮釋學之基本義理,然後處理古典的Euthyphron兩難問題,接著在此脈絡下展開現代性宗教倫理及價值規範向度三基本問題,亦即:一,回到基源:宗教如何作為人類文化之價值規範向度底本源與基礎?二,宗教倫理之主體性:宗教本身的倫理道德系統有何特質?三,宗教面對現代性與當代處境:宗教之價值規範向度又應當如何面對現代社會及當代世界之問題脈絡乃至提出其解決方案?尤其在最後一問題中,本文將揭示中華哲學倫理學如何回應當代倫理議題如人權與寬容等。

並列摘要


Religion is the foundation of human culture. It is the origin of ethical values and norms. However, under the so-called Euthyphro dilemma or paradox, there is a fundamental problem between religion and ethics, especially between the value norm system of religion and the autonomy of philosophical ethics, that is - which is the basis of the other. This article will reconsider this paradox and even suggest its way out from the systemic hermeneutics of (inter) religion, and then reveal the initial response to the three basic issues or problems of religious ethics and its dimension of value norms. Therefore, it shall present the basic theory of systemic hermeneutics of (inter) religion first, and then deal with the classical Euthyphro dilemma, and afterwards develop the three basic issues of modern religious ethics and value norms in this context, namely: 1. Back to the source: How can religion serve as the origin and foundation of the value norm of human culture? 2. The subjectivity of religious ethics: What are the characteristics of the ethical system of religion itself? 3. Religion facing modernity and contemporary situation: How should the value norm of religion confront the problems of modern society and the contemporary world and even propose its solutions? Especially in the last question, this article will indicate how Chinese philosophy and religious ethics respond to contemporary ethical issues such as human rights and tolerance.

參考文獻


《世界人權宣言》前言及第一條,ARMR 12. 10. 1948 (A/RES/217, UN-Doc. 217/A-(III))。
陸敬忠,2018,〈體系性宗教詮釋學之類型學基本構思:從宗教哲學定/意義之詮釋學轉向談起〉(A&HCI) ,《漢語基督教學術論評》 (SinoChristian Studies),第 30 期,頁 125-150。科技部計畫編號:108-2410-H-008-018-MY2。
Aquinas, St.Thomas, Summa Theologica, I-II, Q. 91, Art. 2.
Baggett, David and Walls, Jerry L, 2011, Good God: The Theistic Foundations of Morality, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Düsing, Klaus, 2005, Fundamente der Ethik. Unzeitgemäße typologische und subjektivitätstheoretische Untersuchungen, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, Germany: Frommann-holzboog, pp.9-33.

延伸閱讀