並列摘要
The term of ＂gung-ahn novel＂, or legal-case novel, did not appear until the Southern Sung Dynasty (1127-1279 AD) and had since developed into an independent category. As a result, the ＂gung-ahn novel＂ of the Sung Dynasty is generally regarded as the earliest as well as the most representative of the kind. However, it was as early as in the Tang Dynasty (618-907 AD) that this special kind of novel actually began to grow. Considering the way literature evolves, we have every reason to incorporate Tang Dynasty's legal-case novels, which were written in classical Chinese, into the ＂gung-ahn novel＂ studies. To avoid unnecessary confusion, I defined the terms used in this thesis prior to any discussion of the legal-case novels of the Tang Dynasty. Then, the novels in discussion are categorized, according to their writing patterns, into Type A: cases involving ghosts who seek revenge; and Type B: cases cracked by careful investigation of smart and sharp police officers. An in-depth analysis will be conducted to show the particular style, structure, and spirit that are exclusive to the gung-ahn novels of the Tang Dynasty. I sincerely hope that through this thesis, the history of ＂gung-ahn novel＂ can be made more complete from the Tang, Sung, to the Yuan Dynasty (1271-1368 AD).
延伸閱讀
- 朱祖德（2012）。斯坦因所獲吐魯番「長行坊」文書研究－以唐律相關條文為核心。史學彙刊，(29)，41-58。https://doi.org/10.29991/JHS.201206.0002
- 汪聚應（2003）。唐人豪俠小說篇目考輯。中國文化研究所學報，(43)，361-392。https://doi.org/10.29708/JCS.CUHK.200301_(43).0013
- 曲景毅（2016）。唐代“大手筆”作家之學術空間與研究路徑。載於馬來西亞漢學研究會（主編），漢學與佛教：第十屆馬來西亞漢學國際研討會論文集（頁183-196）。馬來西亞漢學研究會。https://doi.org/10.29466/9789671485705.201612.0010
- 桂齊遜（2005）。《唐律》關於“律文解釋”方式之分析。通識研究集刊，(8)，57-87。https://doi.org/10.6488/JCGE.200512.0057
- 莊蕙綺（2008）。唐代小說跨文類敘事模式初探－以述夢作品為中心。玄奘人文學報，(8)，249-278。https://doi.org/10.29956/HCHJ.200807.0009