辯方庭審交流權的「雙功能」保障－美國法及其啟示

王天民 ； 紀虎

《法令月刊》 62卷11期 (2011/11) Pp. 112-121

https://doi.org/10.6509/TLM.201111_62(11).0008

摘要

刑事被告與辯護律師在庭審期間的交流權是美國法中律師幫助權的一項重要內容，它包括開庭期間的交流權和休庭期間的交流權兩個部分，其中開庭期間的交流權與辯方的「同席性」設置密切相關，而休庭期間交流權的實現則必須具有「隱秘性」。在大陸地區要保證對方的庭審交流權，一方面要讓被告和辯護律師在開庭期間同坐一席，另一方面還要保障休庭期間的會見交流能夠秘密進行。

關鍵字

交流權 ； 同席性 ； 隱秘性

並列摘要

The accused's right to communicate with his attorney in trial is an important part of counsel's assistance assistance in America. It includes the right to communicate during the hearing time and interval time in trial. The former is mainly in connection with the accused's right to be assigned a seat near to his attorney at counsel table, and the latter has the character of secrecy. In our courtroom, we should allow the accused to sit with his attorney during the hearing time and let them to communicate with each other secretly during the rest time in trial.

並列關鍵字

right of communication ； character of seating together in each others presence ； character of secrecy

參考文獻

Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45,68-71 (1932).

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

Shepard, Steven(2006).Should the Criminal Defendant Be Assigned a Seat in Court?.Yale Law Journal.2206.

Walker v. Butterworth, 457 F.Supp. 1233 (1978).

Commonwealth v. Boyd, 246 Pa. 529 (1914).