兩岸智慧財產權司法保護的趨勢與因應

The Trends and Adaption of Cross-Straights Intellectual Judicial Protection

肖振國(Zhen-Guo Xiao)

《法令月刊》 63卷9期 (2012/09) Pp. 103-126

https://doi.org/10.6509/TLM.201209_63(9).0007

摘要

當前兩岸智慧財產權司法保護制度的改革與建設正在持續進行中。這場方興未艾的重大司法制度變革源於智慧財產權審判專業化與全球化的趨勢性要求。然而，隨著時間的推移與變革的深化，為了在司法層面上更有效而全面地推進智慧財產權保護戰略，兩岸法學界和司法界的視野不僅要看到專業化與全球化的趨勢，更要擴展到系統性的需求。長遠來看，這有制於兩岸智慧財產權司法保護體制的有序同步與保護效率的持續提升。具體程序層面上，踐行智慧財產權司法保護系統性需要通過構建相應制度加以實現。此一完善過程大體有兩條思路。一是線性分析的視角。即以程序的時間流程為主軸，截取程序的特定時間斷面，根據不同階段的固有特點與預設功能進行完善。二是塊狀分析的思路。即以主體的法定權限以及現存的子制度為出發點，完善智慧財產權司法保護制度。兩種思維模式交相應用方可能最優化地構建智慧財產權司法保護制度，進而提升智慧財產權司法保護的協調性和銜接性，使兩岸智慧財產權司法保護更加完善。

關鍵字

兩岸智慧財產權 ； 司法保護 ； 未來圖景

並列摘要

Nowadays the system reform and construction of the cross-strait judicial protection on intellectual property have been consistently pushing forward. The critical change about judicial system origins from the requirements of professionalization and globalization in intellectual property areas. However, as the change goes further and deeper, in order to develop the strategy for intellectual property rights more effectively and fully, the cross-strait researchers should enlarge their vision to systematicness, not just focus on professionalization and globalization. In the long run, this would be beneficial to improve the efficiency of protection and orderly synchronization. To improve the systematicness of intellectual judicial protect ion, we need to construct corresponding systems and regulations. In this aspect, we have two paths to implement the Intellectual judicial system. The first one is diachronic analysis. Which means we pick out different phrases specifically and review them according to the the timing of procedures. The other one would be segmental analysis. That means choosing the jurisdiction and sub-systems as starting point and analyzing them, we implement the structure of intellectual judicial system. Only by utilizing both two paths together, we can construct the intellectual judicial system optimum. So that we would be able to increase the harmony and compatibility to make cross-straight intellectual judicial protection a consummate work.

並列關鍵字

intellectual property rights ； judicial protection ； future prospective

參考文獻

Pierocalamandrei、翟小波譯、劉剛譯(2005)。程序與民主。北京:高等教育出版社。

丁麗瑛(2007)。知識產權法。廈門:廈門大學出版社。

王冠璽、周翠(2010)。兩岸民事判決的認可與執行問題研究。法學研究。2010(3)，134-148。

中國社會科學院知識產權中心、中國知識產權培訓中心(2009)。完善知識產權執法體制問題研究。北京:知識產權出版社。

中國商標編委會(2008)。北京市擬探索建立知識產權上訴法院。中華商標。2008(11)，37-37。