大學生體育課個人與社會責任量表之建構與驗證

Construction and Verification of Personal and Social Responsibilities Scale in Physical Education Classes for College Students

李一聖(I-Sheng Lee) ； 郭姿伶(Tzu-Ling Kuo) ； 周宏室(Hung-Shih Chou) ； 潘義祥(Yi-Hsiang Pan)

《大專體育學刊》 22卷3期 (2020/09) Pp. 205-221

https://doi.org/10.5297/ser.202009_22(3).0002

摘要

本研究目的是依據2011年Hellison的責任層級為基礎架構，從質性到量化之途徑，發展一個適合大學生在體育課中使用，具有良好信效度的責任感測量工具，共分為4個研究，研究一以質性方式，建構大學生體育課個人與社會責任指標，首先邀請10位學校體育教學實際工作者，進行3次焦點團體座談，接續再經由2位運動教育博士，且精熟責任模式的學者專家，進行內容效度檢視，最後由10位大學生試填量表；研究二以探索性因素分析、項目分析、信度考驗方式剔除不適當的題項，此階段抽取臺灣公、私立之大學共4所，有效樣本為364人；研究三先利用驗證性因素分析，進行信效度檢驗，再以「利社會行為量表」及「運動動機量表」探討量表之區辨效度，此階段再抽取自臺灣公、私立之大學，共8所學校進行施測，有效樣本為657人；研究四利用組內相關係數考驗量表之再測信度，有效樣本為56人。本研究結果發現：量表共有6個構面與24個題項，構面包含尊重、努力、自我導向、助人、合作、領導，本量表適配指標達到良好的適配標準。本研究結論是建構的大學生體育課個人與社會責任感量表，具有良好的信效度，本量表可應用在大學體育課中，評估大學生個人與社會責任感發展之測量工具。

關鍵字

尊重 ； 努力 ； 自我導向 ； 助人 ； 合作

並列摘要

Drawing on Hellison's research in 2011 and his responsibility level as a rudimentary framework, this paper aimed to establish a valid and reliable responsibility measurement tool for use in college physical education classes. Four studies were conducted employing qualitative and quantitative methods. In Study 1, a qualitative method was employed to construct the indicators of university students' personal and social responsibilities in relation to physical education. First, 10 university-level physical education teachers were invited to three focus group interviews. Subsequently, 2 physical education doctors familiar with Hellison's teaching personal and social responsibility (TPSR) course model examined the study's content validity. Finally, 10 university students filled in the trial scale. Study 2 covered exploratory factor analysis, item analysis, and a reliability test, then improper items were deleted. In this phase, 2 sample groups were selected from public and/or private universities in Taiwan, resulting in 364 valid samples. In Study 3, 657 valid samples were collected from 8 additional universities, and a prosocial behavior and sports motivation scale was employed to examine the predictive power of university students' personal and social responsibilities toward physical education. The scale's construct validity was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Finally, in Study 4, test-retest reliability was assessed through the intraclass correlation coefficient using 56 valid samples. The results indicated 6 dimensions (respect, effort, self-direction, helping others, cooperation, and leadership) with 24 items. The measures of fit of this scale met the standard, supporting the validation of the tool for university students' personal and social responsibilities in relation to physical education. We conclude that the responsibility scale developed in the study can serve as a good tool for the university students' personal and social responsibilities.

並列關鍵字

respect ； effort ； self-direction ； helping others ； cooperation

參考文獻

陳儀蓉、黃芳銘（2006）。組織公民行為量表在男女員工群體上之測驗恆等性檢定。測驗學刊，53 卷 2 期，297-326 頁。doi:10.7108/PT.200612.0297[Chen, Y.-J., & Hwang, F.-M. (2006). Assessing measurement invariance of organizational citizenship behavior scale between male and female staff. Psychological Testing, 53(2), 297-326. doi:10.7108/PT.200612.0297]

葉麗琴、葉麗珠（2012）。自我決定理論在健身運動領域之驗證。大專體育學刊，14 卷 2 期，188-196 頁。doi:10.5297/ser.1402.006[Yeh, L.-C., & Yeh, L.-J. (2012). Verification of self-determination theory in exercise domain. Sports & Exercise Research, 14(2), 188-196. doi:10.5297/ser.1402.006]

潘義祥（2013）。個人與社會責任教學融入運動教育模式之整合課程規劃。中華體育季刊，27 卷2 期，105-112 頁。doi:10.6223/qcpe.2702.2013 06.0901[Pan, Y.-H. (2013). Teaching personal and social responsibility through sport education model. Quarterly of Chinese Physical Education, 27(2), 105-112. doi:10.6223/qcpe.2702.201306.0901]

盧俊宏（2018）。國際期刊對心理測驗與量表編製的新挑戰：更多心理計量學證據要求的趨勢。大專體育學刊，20 卷 4 期，i-vi 頁。doi:10.52 97/ser.201812_20(4).0000[Lu, F. J.-H. (2018). New challenges for the development and validation of psychological tests and scales in international journals: The trend for demanding more psychometric evidence. Sports & Exercise Research, 20(4), i-vi. doi:10.5297/ser.201812_20(4).0000]

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 76-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02723327