並列摘要
Advances in biology and medicine challenge medical professionals in a new sense. Considering issues from a strictly clinical case oriented approach means that the nature of patient's clinical situation has been correctly apprehended. Since the medical decisions rely upon externally imposed constraints, whereas ethics functions as self-imposed constraints, the medical routine might come into conflict with patient needs. Values are aspects of truth and therefore are not relative. Pure questions of value as distinct from questions of fact refer to questions of how the humanistic, interpersonal or emphatic aspects of medicine reflect what to another person means the difference between utilitarian and deontological action guided prospective. Morality is not rooted only in reason, but in moral reason, so it is important to grasp how social impact of responsibility, duty and obligation affect citizens who do not want to be passive consumers of a new medical routine any more.
並列關鍵字
無資料延伸閱讀
- 林晉（2014）。醫學教育的倫理。台北市醫師公會會刊，58(11)，66-68。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=P20110322001-201411-201412040021-201412040021-66-68
- 紀櫻珍、紀琍琍、吳振龍、黃松元（2006）。醫學倫理與醫病關係。北市醫學雜誌，3(12)，1-11。https://doi.org/10.6200/TCMJ.2006.3.12.01
- 陳映燁、李明濱（2000）。醫學倫理學之理論與原則。Journal of Medical Education，4(1)，3-22。https://doi.org/10.6145/jme.200003_4(1).0002
- 戴正德（2006）。醫學倫理教學法的探討。台灣醫學人文學刊，7(1&2)，133-157。https://doi.org/10.30097/FJMH.200606.0010
- 戴正德（1998）。醫學倫理的理論思考。Journal of Medical Education，2(1)，3-9。https://doi.org/10.6145/jme.199803_2(1).0002