透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.98.13
  • 期刊

教育領導研究應用PLS-SEM

Using PLS-SEM in Educational Leadership Research

摘要


PLS-SEM能分析形成性構念和形成性指標、因應小樣本、樣本非常態等問題,因為統計軟體普及,漸多相關應用論文和研究方法,但缺乏體系性論述。因此本文聚焦討論PLS-SEM的發展現況,檢視教育領導研究應用PLS-SEM的課題。研究結果透過文獻計量學分析清楚指出PLS、PLS-PM和PLS-SEM的概念發展情形、提出其相關中文譯名和定義。另外也比較SEM、PLS-SEM和GSCA-SEM的理論基礎和方法特性,說明如何評估模式品質、進行基礎和進階分析的流程、選擇分析軟體、及提出分析結果報告規範。最後,提出教育領導研究的特性,討論教育領導研究如何結合PLS-SEM,和指出教育領導研究應用PLS-SEM的課題。

並列摘要


PLS-SEM can analyze formative constructs and formative indicators, as well as adapt well to small sample and non-normal sample. Recently using software of PLS-SEM prevails among researchers in different disciplines, related application studies and analysis methods for PLS-SEM increase gradually, but lack for systematic discourse on it. So the study focused upon discussing the development of PLS-SEM, also explored several themes about educational leadership research using PLS-SEM. The results showed clear developments of PLS, PLS-PM and PLS-SEM with Bibliometrics, proposed different translations about them in Chinese, and then discussed their definitions. Moreover some different theoretic bases and method characters showed among SEM, PLS-SEM and GSCASEM. This study also proposed how to assess model quality, conducted basic and advance analytic procedure, operated software, and illustrated regulations of final report about PLS-SEM. Finally this study described characters of educational leadership research, discussed how to connect educational leadership research with PLS-SEM, and pointed out application theme for using PLS-SEM.

參考文獻


葉連祺(2013)。教育領導研究可探討什麼?。學校行政,84,1‒35。doi:10.3966/160683002013030084001
葉連祺(2018a)。教育行政學位論文應用計量分析方法改善及相關量化分析發展。學校行政,116,147-211。doi:10.6423/HHHC.201807_(116).0007
葉連祺(2018b)。教育管理變項研究主題與計量分析方法之綜析。學校行政,114,150‒182。doi:10.6423/HHHC.201803_(114).0008
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000
Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191

延伸閱讀


國際替代計量