教育行政學位論文應用計量分析方法改善及相關量化分析發展

Improving on Using Quantitative Analytic Methods in Educational Administration Theses and the Developments of Related Quantitative Analysis

葉連祺(Lain-Chyi Yeh)

《學校行政》 116期 (2018/07) Pp. 147-211

https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.201807_(116).0007

摘要

教育行政領域學位論文頗多採取量化取向，運用多種計量分析方法處理 資料，以產出客觀證據，但是不少討論指出錯誤運用計量分析方法和錯誤解讀計量分析結果會影響量化研究品質。本研究討論一些臺灣地區教育行政學位論文計量分析遭遇問題，兼論相關計量分析方法發展情形，指出可行改善作為。主要聚焦調查工具編製、變項關係研究、評估指標研究、質性研究計量分析等四類分析工作，針對調查工具構念效度考驗、重要－表現分析分類檢驗、變項中介關係考驗和偵測、變項交互作用關係偵測、影響路徑關係模式選用SEM考驗、Delphi評定共識和評定者專業性測定、AHP評估指標合理性和專家評定共識判定、及質性研究計量分析方法選用等八類事項，指出學位論文遭遇的問題、說明有關的計量分析方法應用重點及其新近發展趨勢，並提出可行改善對策，此包括可行分析流程、可運用分析方法及其評估標準。

關鍵字

量化研究 ； SEM ； AHP ； Delphi ； IPA ； 中介分析 ； 質性研究

並列摘要

Many theses in educational administration conducted quantitative approach that used various quantitative analytic methods to handle data to produce objective evidences. But many papers discussed several errors in using quantitative analytic methods as well as in interrupting the results of quantitative studies that led to influence the quality of quantitative researches. So the study discussed some problems concerned in quantitative analysis which happened in the educational administration theses in Taiwan, illustrated the related developments about quantitative analytic methods, and pointed out some available modifications. For theses above purposes, the study focused on discussing four analytic works: the development of investigatory tools, the relationship of various variables, the assessment indicator construction, and the quantitative analysis of qualitative researches. Eight analysis affairs which included testing the construct validity of investigatory tool, testing the classifications in importance-performance analysis, detecting the mediations in various variables, detecting the interactions in various variables, testing the casual relationship models with structural equation modeling, assessing the consistency of assessment and the profession of raters in Delphi method, determining the reasonableness of assessment indicators and the consensus of experts’ assessment in AHP analysis, as well as selecting the appropriate quantitative analytic methods in qualitative researches, were discussed. Moreover the problems of application for quantitative analysis in theses were pointed out, the topics for using in the related quantitative analytic methods were explained, and several available strategies to improve were proposed that included useable analytic procedures, analytic methods as well as assessment criteria.

並列關鍵字

quantitative research ； structural equation modeling ； analytic hierarchy process ； Delphi method ； important performance analysis ； mediation analysis ； qualitative research

參考文獻

葉連祺（2018）。教育管理變項研究主題與計量分析方法之綜析。學校行政，114，150‒182。doi: 10.6423/HHHC.201803_(114).0008

葉連祺（2016）。應用CPC法分析國小特色學校認證品質評估權重指標。教育行政研究，6(1)，27‒67。doi: 10.3966/222350002016060601002

Gonzalez, O., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2018). A bifactor approach to model multifaceted constructs in statistical mediation analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 78(1), 5‒31. doi: 10.1177/0013164416673689

Holey, E. A., Feeley, J. L., Dixon, J., & Whittaker, V. J. (2007). An exploration of the use of simple statistics to measure consensus and stability in Delphi studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(52). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-52

Jennrich, R. I., & Bentler, P. M. (2011). Exploratory bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika, 76(4), 537‒549. doi:10.1007/s11336-011-9218-4