透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.186.72
  • 期刊

工業遺產空間再利用可適性之檢核要項研究

Study on the Checking Items for Adaptive Field Reuse of Industrial Heritage

摘要


隨著國內積極地發展工業遺產空間再利用的同時,其中有關空間再利用成效的「可適性」判別,就需要建立一套有系統的檢核表。本論文研究之目的為確立工業遺產空間再利用的「可適性」之檢核要項。第一階段先對七位在產、官、學領域的工業遺產空間再利用專家進行結構性深度訪談,結束後將訪談逐 字稿進行編碼與分析,第二階段採用KJ法將譯碼後的文字資料進行分類、歸納與命名,經由二回合的KJ法分類結果就作為德菲法問卷之基礎,發展出第一階段德菲法問卷,共有4項檢核構面和18項次級要 項。第三階段以德菲法之操作程序整合14位產、官、學界專家意見,進行三回合之專家問卷調查,結果達到專家一致性意見。本研究透過嚴謹的研究過程,建構出工業遺產空間再利用可適性之檢核要項表,其中包括4項檢核構面、22項次級要項,及次級要項下有所考量相關的涵義說明,分別為:「再利用的價值」構面有5項次級要項;「再利用的利益關係人」構面有6項次級要項;「再利用的規劃」構面有5項次級要項;「再利用的經營管理」構面有6項次級要項。本研究成果可提供目前工業遺產進行空間再 利用時,各價值是否被彰顯、各關係人的利益是否被重視、是否有良好的規劃及經營的檢核依據。最後 總結研究結果提出後續研究建議,以提供相關單位及研究者未來之參考。

並列摘要


As reuse of industrial heritage space actively expands domestically, the checking items for evaluating the result of "adaptive" reuse of space should be systematically established. This paper aims to specify the checking items for evaluating "adaptive" reuse of industrial heritage space. The research was divided into three phases. In first phase, in-depth interviews of seven experts in reuse of industrial heritage space from industry, government and academia were conducted; their opinions were then encoded and analyzed. In second phase, through two-cycle KJ method, results from first phase interviews were categorized, deduced, and entitled for the follow-up Delphi survey. The Delphi-1 Questionnaire contained 4 evaluation dimensions and 18 sub- items. The third phase integrated opinions from 14 experts and continued three cycles of expert survey to reach the agreement in expert’s opinions. At last, 4 evaluation dimensions and 22 sub- items were created for evaluating adaptive reuse of industrial heritage space. There are 5 sub-items in the "Value of reuse" dimension, 6 sub-items in the "Stakeholder of reuse" dimension, 5 sub-items in the "Planning of reuse" dimension and 6 sub-items in the "Management of reuse" dimension. The result of this paper can be provided as the criteria to evaluate if the value of reuse is manifested, if the benefits of the Stakeholders are valued, and if it’s well-planned and managed when it comes to reuse of Industrial heritage space.

參考文獻


Bernard, H. R.(1988).Research methods in cultural anthropology.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
Chen, I. C.(2006).Evaluating on the industrial heritage in Taiwan- From a viewpoint of technological formation.Proceedings of The 7th International Symposium for Environment-Behavior Studies.(Proceedings of The 7th International Symposium for Environment-Behavior Studies).:
Douglas, J.(2012).Building adaptation.New York, NY:Taylor & Francis.
Denzin, N. K.(Ed.),Lincoln, Y. S.(Ed.)(1994).The handbook of qualitative research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Langston, C.,Wong, F. K. W.,Hui, E. C. M.,Shen, L. Y.(2008).Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong.Building and Environment.43(10),1709-1718.

延伸閱讀