The Changing Governance of Academic Innovation in Taiwan: A Preliminary Post-STBL Review

台灣學術創新的新統理：科技基本法實施後之初探

張元杰(Yuan-Chieh Chang) ； 劉孟俊(Meng-Chun Liu) ； 楊宜興(Phil Y. Yang)

《台灣管理學刊》 4卷3期 (2004/08) Pp. 271-287

https://doi.org/10.6295/TAMJ.2004.0403.01

摘要

在模式二知識生產方式的崛起，跨領域之知識創造與運用乃為時勢所趨。以大學知識來促進產業創新來源的新統理，變成各國勢在必行的政策。本研究初步探討在科技基本法實施之後，台灣各大專院校對新的“科學-經濟＂統理之回應，並以四個主要構面：制度創新、組織創新、商品化創新與新產學夥伴關係，來分析其對國內學術創新的影響。本研究以問卷調查方式，調查國內所有大專院校，結果發現科技基本法實施後的初期，已逐漸促進各校對於智慧財產權的保護與運用與產業界的研究夥伴等活動。然而，在學術創新之新統理機制下，學術研究人員對機會認知上的缺乏以及產學合作的障礙依然普遍存在著，爲完全實現學術知識對創新體系的貢獻，社會創新將是下一階段的重要議題。

關鍵字

科技基本法 ； 學術創新 ； 專利 ； 授權 ； 產學合作

並列摘要

In the rise of mode 2 knowledge production, the new governance allowing universities to facilitate knowledge flow into new ideas and sources of industrial innovation becomes imperative. This paper preliminarily examines how Taiwanese higher education institutions (HEIs) responded to the new ”scientific-economic” governance that emerged in the post Science Technology Basic Law era. Four major dimensions of academic innovation are investigated, namely: institutional innovation, organizational innovation, commercial innovation and new university-industry partnerships. Through a postal questionnaire survey of all HEIs in Taiwan, this study reveals that the new governance of academic innovation has gradually stimulated the university's propensity to intellectual property protection and exploitation, and industrial research partnerships in the preliminary post-STBL period. Vulnerable groups of HEIs in academic innovation activities are identified. However, cognitive failure of academic faculty and cooperation barriers among research partners still prevail. In order to fully materialize academic knowledge, a social innovation is needed.

並列關鍵字

Science and technology basic law ； Academic innovation ； Patenting ； Licensing ； University-industry partnership

參考文獻

Bordt, M.,C. Read(1999).Science and Technology Redesign Project.Ottawa:Statistics Canada.

Cox, D.,P. Gummett,,K. Barker(1999).Government Laboratories: Transition and Transformation.Amsterdam:IOS Press.

Di Gregorio, D.,S. Shane(2003).Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others.Research Policy.32,209-227.

Diez, J. R.(2000).The importance of public research institutes in innovative networks-empirical results from the Metropolitan Innovation Systems Barcelona, Stockholm and Vienna.European Planning Studies.8,451-462.

Druilhe, C.,E. Garnsey,W. During,R. Oakey,S. Kauser (eds)(2001).New Technology-Based Firms in the New Millennium.Oxford, UK:Pergamon.