行政訴訟採取律師強制代理制度之研究

The Study of the Compulsory Representation in Administrative Process

張文郁(Wun-Yu Chang)

《臺北大學法學論叢》 72期 (2009/12) Pp. 47-73

https://doi.org/10.6774/TULR.200912.0047

摘要

行政訴訟法雖於民國87年與96年經兩次修正，然而尚有改善之空間。因此，司法院仍計畫於近期內對行政訴訟法進行更深入之修正，以落實憲法第16條對於人民訴訟權之保障，並兼顧訴訟資源之有效利用。計畫修正之重點之一乃是衡量是否在行政訴訟採取律師強制代理制度。亦即藉由律師強制代理制度之採行是否能促進當事人權益之保護、促進訴訟程序之順暢進行並減輕法院之負擔。由於我國行政訴訟文獻上關於是否採取律師強制代理主義之文獻相當欠缺，是以本文擬藉助於民事訴訟法之相關規定以及德國民事訴訟法和行政法院法之文獻，對於本問題進行探討。

關鍵字

行政訴訟 ； 律師強制代理 ； 訴訟權之保障 ； 訟程序之順暢 ； 減輕法院之負擔

並列摘要

Although the Code of Administrative Litigation has been amended twice in 1998 and 2007, there is still some space to improve. Therefore Judicial Yuan plans to revise it again in order to fulfill people's right of litigation stated in Article 16 in the Constitution and effectively use the source of litigation as well. To decide whether to execute constraint Lawyer Representative System or not is one of the main parts of the plan. In other words, can we strengthen the protection of the procedure rights for the parties, make the litigation procedure smooth and reduce the court’s burden due to the execution of Constraint Lawyer Representative System? Since there are few books or documents talking about the Constraint Lawyer Representative System, this article is written for this issue in accordance with the Code of Civil Law Litigation, German Code of Civil Law Litigation and German Code of Administration Court.

並列關鍵字

administrative procedure ； Constraint Lawyer Representative System ； protection of the procedure rights for the parties ； procedure smooth ； reduce the court's burden

參考文獻

陳榮宗、林慶苗(2004)。民事訴訟法（上）。三民書局股份有限公司。

蔡志方(1993)。行政救濟與行政法學（二）。三民書局股份有限公司。

蔡志方(2001)。行政救濟法新論。元照出版有限公司。

Verwaltungsgerichtsordnung

Günther(1988).Zum Anwaltszwang im Revisionsverfahren - Überprüfung bisheriger Antworten auf einige Fragen der lex lata.(DVBl).