原鄉部落動態能力之分析：對部落治理的意涵

原鄉部落如何發掘原住民族自身能力，以建構並強化其邁向自立、自尊與自主的潛能，是部落治理的重要議題。本研究旨在探討原鄉部落的動態能力，據以提出促進原鄉部落良善治理的相關建議。本研究以質性研究方法進行，邀請27位具有原住民身分，且熟悉社區發展相關事務之各領域的專家學者、實務工作者及公部門代表進行個別深入訪談或焦點團體。研究結果顯示，原鄉部落內部的動態能力呈現多元樣貌，且與其所處的外部環境產生交互作用，而影響到部落的治理。本研究依據分析結果進行討論後，提出六項對原鄉部落良善治理的相關建議，包括：（1）參與者vs.旁觀者：導入「充權」策略，激發年輕族人的公共參與；（2）自立自主vs.慣性依賴：建立「責信」機制，奠定部落良善治理的根基；（3）成就地位vs.先賦地位：培育「能力為本」的領導者，引領部落開創新局；（4）協力夥伴vs.本位主義：建立公開透明的溝通平台，實踐審議式民主；（5）勇於變革vs.故步自封：營造友善開放的環境，帶動部落向上提升；（6）多元融合vs.偏見歧視：培育「文化才能」工作者，促進族群共存共融。

關鍵字

社區能力；社區資產；部落動態能力；部落治理

並列摘要

Building the capabilities of the indigenous tribe is the foundation of tribes' self-reliance and tribal self-reliance is an important issue in tribal governance. This study aims to explore the dynamic capacity of indigenous tribes, and then propose relevant suggestions for promoting good governance for indigenous tribes. This study was conducted via a qualitative research method, with individual in-depth interviews or focus groups of 27 indigenous people, including scholars, tribal practitioners and public sector representatives of community development-related affairs. The results of the study show that the dynamic capacities of the indigenous tribes have multiple modes, and that they interact with the external environment in which they are located, thus affecting tribal governance. After the discussions, and based on the analyses, this study puts forward 6 relevant suggestions for the good governance of indigenous tribes, including: (1) participant vs. bystander - introducing the "empowerment" strategy to stimulate the public participation of young people; (2) inertia dependence vs. self-reliance - establishing the "accountability" mechanism to lay the foundation for the good governance of the tribe; (3) achieved status vs. inherited status - cultivating "competency-based" leaders to lead the tribe to create new opportunities; (4) collaborative partner vs. selfish departmentalism - establishing an open and transparent communication platform to practice deliberative democracy; (5) courage to change vs. clinging to self-styled - creating a friendly and open environment to enhance tribes upward mobility; and diversity vs. prejudice: fostering "cultural competence-based" workers to promote the coexistence and co-prosperity of ethnic groups.

並列關鍵字

community capacity ； community asset ； tribal dynamic capacity ； tribal governance

參考文獻

柯于璋（2020）。〈公私協力夥伴關係之爭議與課責：以我國文化創意產業園區委外經營為例〉，《公共行政學報》，58，55-87。https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.202003_(58).0002 【Ke, Y.-C. (2020). Controversies and accountability of public-private partnerships: The case of cultural and creative industrial park in R.O.C. Journal of Public Administration, 58, 55-87. https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.202003_(58).0002】

林淑馨（2018）。〈協力神話的崩壞？我國地方政府與非營利組織的協力現況〉，《公共行政學報》，55，1-36。https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.201809_(55).0001 【Lin, S.-H. (2018). The fall of collaborative governance? Current collaboration between local governments and non-profit organizations. Journal of Public Administration, 55, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.201809_(55).0001】

林煥笙、余孟哲、劉康慧（2019）。〈災害防救與社區韌性發展：以屏東大後部落為例〉，《公共行政學報》，57，1-38。https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.201909_(57).0001 【Lin, H.-S., Yu, M.-C., & Liu, H. K. (2019). Disaster management and development of community resilience: A case study of the DaHo tribe in Pingtung county in Taiwan. Journal of Public Administration, 57, 1-38. https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.201909_(57).0001】

莊俐昕（2019）。〈從社會資本觀點探究原鄉社會資源整合與網絡建構：以南投縣原鄉地區為例〉，《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，23(1)，45-89。https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.201906_23(1).0002 【Chuang, L.-H. (2019). Exploring social resource integration and network construction in indigenous region from social capital perspective: Case of Nantou county. Social Policy & Social Work, 23(1), 45-89. https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.201906_23(1).0002】

許俊才／Kui Kasirisir（2021）。〈尋求留在部落生活與工作的機會：一個原鄉照顧服務勞動合作社「生與存」的故事〉，《社會政策與社會工作學刊》，25(2)，99-138。https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.202112_25(2).0003 【Hsu, C.-T. (2021). Seeking the opportunity to live and work within the tribe: The story of labor cooperatives for care services in indigenous areas. Social Policy & Social Work, 25(2), 99-138. https://doi.org/10.6785/SPSW.202112_25(2).0003】

主題瀏覽