透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.59.236.219
  • 期刊

親師互動之微觀政治分析:教師專業主義vs.家長彰權益能

Micropolitical Analysis of Parent-Teacher Interaction: Teacher Professionalism vs. Parent Empowerment

摘要


本研究主要以微觀政治學觀點,探討教師專業主義面對家長彰權益能,在親師互動中之意識型態與微觀政治策略。研究者採質性探究方式,深度訪談6位一般市區之國小級任教師。研究結果發現,親師互動存在著意識型態衝突與各種政治策略。其獲致以下結論:教師普遍知覺到家長的彰權益能,但對其法源依據並不清楚;教師秉持著專業主義,對家長參與有一定的容忍範圍;家長彰權益能有其正用效果,亦常有誤用之衝突;教師發展出各種政治策略,以應付家長的彰權益能;教師公開透明的策略掌握制勝先機,太過順從可能損及教師專業。

並列摘要


This study investigates the ideologies between parent empowerment and teacher professionalism, and the micropolitical strategies of parent-teacher interaction through the micropolitical lens. The researcher examines teachers' perceptions of the implications of prarents' empowerment for teacher-parent relations and teachers' means to manage with parent empowerment. In-depth interviews with six homeroom teachers in north town elementary school reveals that teacher favor parents' involvement but also feel vulnerable to the increasing influence of parents. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: Firstly, teachers have the perceptions of parent empowerment, but most of them don't know the parents' right of law. Secondly, parents' participation is limited to zones of tolerance that teacher professionalism would allow. Thirdly, parent empowerment has positive effects, but it may also be misused and result conflicts. fourthly, teachers use various kinds of political means to cope with parent empowerment. Finally, the strategies of open communication and transparency can always be successful, and too much complying may undermine teachers' professional position.

參考文獻


王文科、中正大學教育研究所主編(2005)。質的研究方法。高雄市:麗文文化。
王麗雲、潘慧玲(2000)。教師彰權益能的概念與實施策略。教育研究集刊。44(1),173-199。
伍鴻麟(2002)。桃園縣國小家長參與學校教育及親師互動情形之研究(碩士論文)。台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
吳沐馨(2004)。幼教師對家長參與班級活動之困境知覺研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學幼兒教育研究所。
吳珍梅()。

被引用紀錄


鮑明彥(2015)。教保服務人員組織概況及功能之研究〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2015.00126
陳惠雪(2023)。國小雙語自然教師的專業認同:「衝突」-「協調」-「再生」教育研究集刊(69:2),1-48。https://doi.org/10.53106/102887082023066902001

延伸閱讀