性／交易的相互性

On Mutuality of Sex, and Reciprocity of Sex Trade

甯應斌(Yin-Bin Ning)

《政治與社會哲學評論》 18期 (2006/09) Pp. 151-174

https://doi.org/10.6523/168451532006090018004

摘要

哲學家S. E. Marshall論證「性應該是相互的」，並且由此推論「性交易（賣淫）因為不是相互的性，故而是錯的」。本文則從理論與例證反駁了Marshall的論證，並且釐清了「相互性」或「互惠性」的意義。

關鍵字

性交易 ； 相互性 ； 互惠 ； 皮繩愉虐 ； 性倫理

並列摘要

Philosopher S. E. Marshall argues that sex should be mutual, and thus sex trade is wrong because its mode of sex generally lacks mutuality. This essay analyzes and refutes Marshall's argument by using various examples and showing mutuality sometimes may be incompatible with reciprocity.

並列關鍵字

sex trade ； mutuality ； reciprocity ； BDSM ； sexual ethics

參考文獻

甯應斌(2004)。再論性工作與現代性－高夫曼式的詮釋分析。《台灣社會研究》季刊。55，141-224。

Barbalet, J. M.(1998).Emotion, Social Theory and Social Structure: A Macrosociological Approach.New York:Cambridge University Press.

Belliotti, Raymond(1993).Good Sex: Perspectives in Sexual Ethics.Lawrence, Kansas:Unversity of Kansas.

Bertocci, Peter A.,Robert Trevas(eds.)(1997).Philosophy of Sex and Love: A Reader.Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.

Ericsson, Lars(1980).Charges Against Prostitution: An Attempt at a Philosophical Assessment.Ethics.90,335-336.