The time frame during which a political candidate uses negative advertising during his campaign and that attacking points that the advertisement appeals are critical to the advertisement's effectiveness. Based on temporal construal theory, which comes from consumer psychology, this paper explores whether the timing in broadcasting a negative advertisement (i.e., temporal distance from the voting day) has a direct effect on voters' advertising responses and candidate responses, and investigates if there exists a match between temporal distance of the advertisement and the advertisement's appeal importance or a match between temporal distance and the ad's appeal content. We use the younger (i.e., graduate students and undergraduate students) and older electorate (i.e., white-collar workers) to conduct two experiments. Results indicate that for the younger electorate, the earlier a candidate announces a negative ad, the better the advertising effectiveness. However, temporal distance does not have effects for the older subjects. When the voting day is temporally distant, important and issue-related appeals, compared with unimportant and image-related ones, generate more beneficial effects for the ad sponsor. In contrast, when the voting day is temporally imminent, unimportant and image-related appeals are more advantageous for the sponsor, especially for the older electorate. The implication of these and other findings are discussed.