《韓非子》與《呂氏春秋》寓言結構之比較研究

The Comparative Research of Fables' Structure between Hain-Fei-Tsu and Lin-Sh-Chuen-Chiou

吳福相(Fu-Shiang Wu)

《實踐博雅學報》 10期 (2008/07) Pp. 71-88

https://doi.org/10.7041/SCJLA.200807.0071

摘要

本文探索二家寓言結構之比較，就全書結構言，二家並皆有系統詛織且結構宏偉之大中小寓言群形式。就分篇結構言，可分爲：一萹之中與各則之間，就前者言又可分爲直進式與首括式比較二家之異同並明《韓非子》所以少有尾括式與雙括式之緣由；就後者言，二家並皆有並列式、重複式、轉折式、遞進式、連鎖氏之結構且同中有異，異中有同，深值吾人闡幽析微，而獲妙諦。綜上異同之比較研究，則足令吾人更能因此披文入情，深刻了解作品之情思，體悟讀者之感受，明白作者創作之真實。

關鍵字

整體結構 ； 分篇結構 ； 首括氏 ； 連鎖式 ； 遞進式

並列摘要

This article explores the comparative research of fables' structure between Hain-Fei-Tsu and Lin-Sh-Chuen-Chiou. Referring to the structure, they have large, medium and small fables' group styles of systematical organizations and magnificent structures. As to separate structures, Ⅰ divide them into ”on one chapter” and ”between one chapter and the other”. There are ”going-ahead style” and ”beginning bracket style” in the former. Ⅰ compare the differences between them and explain the reason why Hain-Fei-Tsu has few tail bracket style and twin bracket style. For between one chapter and the other style, they all have the structures of parallel style, repeating style, turning style, going-forward style and chain style. They have the similarity between the differences and the difference between the similarities in the structures.
From the above-mentioned comparative research of similarities and differences, we will more understand the thought and emotions of each work and realize the feelings of the readers and apprehend the author's creative origins.

並列關鍵字

entire structure ； separate structure ； beginning bracket style ； chain style ； going-forward style

參考文獻

王邦雄(1977)。韓非子哲學。台北:東大圖書公司。

王靜芝(1977)。韓非思想體系。台北:輔大文學院。

田鳳台(1979)。呂氏春秋研究。政大。

朱守亮(1992)。韓非子釋評。台北:五南書局。

李文標(1977)。韓非思想體系。台北:幼獅文化事業公司。