2007亞洲男排四強挑戰賽得分結構之分析

Analysis of Score Sources in 2007 Asian Men's Volleyball Challenge Taiwan Tournament

賴淑惠(Shu-Hui Lai)

《排球教練科學》 12期 (2008/12) Pp. 48-54

https://doi.org/10.6948/SVC.200812.0048

摘要

本研究之目的在於了解我國男子排球代表隊在整體的技戰術中，各隊得分結構之分析與主動得分技術之表現之優劣。以2007亞洲男排四強挑戰賽台灣站的6場比賽為研究對象，將比賽實況使用數位攝影機的拍攝錄影，再把資料逐一紀錄後，針對各隊的攻擊、攔網與發球等主動得分技術進行分析，以百分等級探討4隊在各項主動得分技術的運用現況，再以單因子變異數分析檢定4隊在三項主動得分技術的效果上是否呈現顯著差異。經由本研究的結果得到以下的結論：
一、各隊在得分結構上，皆是以攻擊得分為最高（平均59.4%），其次是對方失誤(28.2%)與攔網得分（平均8.5%），最後才是發球得分（平均3.9%）。顯示在目前的比賽中，除了積極得分外，如何降低失分亦成為致勝的關鍵。
二、各隊在主動技術得分表現上，中國隊、南韓隊與日本隊在發球得分表現上皆優於中華隊，而日本隊在攻擊得分的表現上優於中華隊。

關鍵字

2007亞洲四強挑戰賽 ； 得分結構 ； 主動得分技術

並列摘要

The main purpose of this research was to understand the different score sources of volleyball games among the 4 teams in 2007 Asian Men's Challenge in Taiwan tournament. The 4 teams were China (CHN), Korea (KOR), Japan (JPN), and Chinese Taipei (TPE). The subjects of this research were the 6 games, which had been filmed with digital camera; moreover, all the data were recorded from the films. The results were shown as percentage to figure out how each team applied the skills in the games. Also, to see if there was any significant difference in the effects of the skills among the 4 teams, the One-way ANOVA was applied. According to the results of all the analysis, the results were indicated that:
1. The most score sources were the attack score (59.4%), the second were opponent's error (28.2%), the third were block score (8.5%), the last were sever score (3.9%).
2. About the effects of active skill scores, CHN, KOR, and JPN were better than TPE in serve scores. JPN was better than TPE in attack scores.

並列關鍵字

2007 Asian Men's Challenge ； score sources ； active skills

參考文獻

丁世聰、張紅松、丁世勇(2005)。從主動得分效果看雅典奧運女排三甲現狀。西安體育學院學報。22(3)，88-115。

李建毅(2006)。我國優秀男子排球選手得分因素競技能力與比賽成績表現之關聯研究。排球教練科學。8，52-73。

杜曉偉、楊勁蒼(1999)。每球得分制新規則對男排比賽得分規律影響的初步研究。西安體育學報。16(2)，45-47。

林柏化(2005)。排球比賽關聯技術效益模式評價之研究。大專體育學刊。7(4)，113-121。

陳雪梅、李新紅、薛明陸(2004)。亞洲女排制勝因素分析。解放軍體育學院學報。23(4)，61-63。