- 期刊
- OpenAccess
國民運動中心與社區簡易型運動設施效益分析
A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Government Recreation Centers and Privately Owned Sports Facilities
摘要
本研究旨在探討都會區「國民運動中心」與社區「簡易運動設施」兩種不同規模大小運動設施之使用效益分析。本研究採用文獻分析法及德懷術專家意見調查法建構「國民運動中心與簡易型運動設施效益評估指標問卷」後，再對台北市運動中心之運動民眾以便利抽樣之方式進行問卷調查，並輔以產官學界專家之深度訪談，來綜整國民運動中心與簡易型運動設施不同之使用效益。研究結果顯示：國民運動中心及社區簡易運動設施效益評估所需的4項一級指標社會、環境、財務及經濟效益構面，皆呈現國民運動中心效益高於社區簡易運動設施之現象；在4項一級指標下之49項二級指標中，社區簡易運動設施因設置於鄰里中，且其地緣關係佳、可及性高，加上其免費或低價之特性，使其在「提供社區居民社交及聯誼平台」、「增進社區居民之凝聚力」及「發展地方特色」等方面之效益稍微優於國民運動中心外，其餘46項指標皆為國民運動中心較優。依據結果本研究結論可以作為政府後續擬定「改善國民運動環境第二期計畫」之參考，以利擬訂具體策略改善社區簡易運動設施之經營管理狀況及硬體設計興建與維護之品質標準。
並列摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of government-run recreation centers with privately owned and operated sports facilities regarding several factors including those that are social, economic, financial, and environmental. A questionnaire was designed containing 4 first-level and 49 second-level indicators obtained from a close review of several scholarly articles and field literature. The questionnaire involved employing the Delphi method and using a convenience sampling of 300 patrons of both government and private recreation centers in Taiwan. Afterward, intensive interviews were conducted with experts working in the government, academia, and the health and recreation industry to collect and examine their views on the comparative effectiveness of these two types of managed operations. The results are summarized as follows. Regarding the first-level indicators, the government-run recreation centers were found to be more effective than neighborhood sports facilities in all 4 of the major factors examined. The government recreation centers also had better effectiveness scores than those of the neighborhood sports facilities on 46 of the 49 second-level indicators. Thus, this study showed that, based on the opinions of both patrons and experts, government-run recreation centers are substantially more efficient and successful than privately owned and operated sports facilities.