本研究以師範大學及教育大學體育相關科系學生爲研究對象(N=500),透過問卷調查方式,探討師範生的教學信念及其教學表現的現況與關係。所得資料經統計處理與分析後,得結論包括:(一)計得「自我反省與教學能力」、「教學策略與技巧」、「個別差異與學習潛力」、「課程內容」、「教學決定與責任」及「體育專業」等六個教學信念因素,以及「教學方法與技巧」、「瞭解學生與適性教學」、「應用媒體與資源」及「輔導統整學習」等四個教學表現因素。(二)體育科系師範生普遍具有較高的教學信念特徵,惟在教師主導教學活動與擔負學生學習責任等方面,具有較低的教學信念特徵。(三)不同性別、學程及年級等背景學生在教學信念及教學表現部分因素間存有顯著的差異情形,且男生明顯高於女生,初教學程學生明顯高於中教學程學生,一年級生明顯高於四年級生。(四)教學信念與教學表現各因素間均呈現顯著正相關,顯示教學信念與其教學表現具有密切的關係。進一步以迴歸分析發現,整體教學信念確實可以有效預測整體教學表現,且六個教學信念因素對整體教學表現的影響,具有高度的解釋力,其中又以「教學策略與技巧信念」因素具有最佳的解釋力。最後,透過逐步迴歸法建立最佳的預測方程式,即整體教學表現=.469×教學策略與技巧信念+.146×教學決定與責任信念+.132×個別差異與學習潛力信念+1.091。
This research use ”Normal University” and ”Education University” students' are research sample (N=500) in survey questionnaire. This research discuss the current and relationship between pre-service teachers' teaching beliefs and their teaching performances. After data analysis, the results found: (1) the ”self-reflection and teaching ability”, ”teaching strategy and skill”, ”individual difference and learning potential”, ”teaching content”, ”teaching decision and responsibility”, and ”profession in physical education” are six teaching beliefs factor, and ”teaching method and skill”, ”understanding student and the adapted teaching”. ”application of media and resource”, and ”assistant overall learning” are four teaching performances factor. (2) Normal University physical students general have higher teaching beliefs characteristics, however, have lower teaching beliefs in teaching activities and responsible for students' learning. (3) Different gender, teacher education and grade in demographic have significant difference in teaching beliefs and teaching performances. Male tends to be higher than female, elementary teacher education tends to be higher than high teacher education, and freshman tends to be higher than senior. (4) Teaching beliefs and teaching performances has positive relationship. The regression analysis found the six teaching beliefs factors can predict the overall teaching performances, in addition, the ”teaching strategic and the skill beliefs” factor can explain most. The prediction function which was deliberated by using the regression analysis is ”overall teaching performances =.469 X teaching strategic and skill +.146 X teaching decision and responsibility +.132 X individual difference and learning potential +1.091”