身心障礙者非在地安置福利身分權益保障之探討－以《社會救助法》低收入戶資格為例

DISCUSSION ON THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS AND INTERESTS OF THE NON-LOCAL RESERRLEMENT WELFARE STATUS FOR THE PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY HANDICAPPED - TAKING THE QUALIFICATION OF LOW-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS IN THE PUBLIC ASSISTANCE ACT AS AN EXAMPLE

蔡旻家(Min-Chia Tsai)

《國立臺灣科技大學人文社會學報》 19卷4期 (2023/12) Pp. 327-347

摘要

《社會救助法》作為照顧低收入戶、中低收入戶及救助遭受急難或災害者的基本大法，為許多福利身分的基本條件，取得低收入戶身分，便確保取得相關福利身分權益。但對於依《社會救助法》申請過程中，除了需要進行資產調查外，尚有「實際居住」的排除問題。若依《身心障礙者權益保障法》取得身心障礙者日間照顧及住宿式費用補助後，但因在地資源不足，由家屬協助安置於非轄機構。安置後，因資產調查條件消滅，卻又因安置異地導致「未實際居住」，使得安置異地國民權益受損。透過整理社會福利之概念，回應政府作為社會福利提供者所需承擔責任，並且提供建議，降低政府以「非轄民眾」作為推託之詞，實則侵害民眾權益之實。

關鍵字

身心障礙者日間照顧及住宿式費用補助 ； 社會救助法 ； 籍在人不在

並列摘要

The "Public Assistance Act" is the basic law to take care of low- and middle-income households and help those suffering from emergencies or disasters. However, in the application process according to the "Public Assistance Act," in addition to the need for asset investigation, there is still the exclusion of "actual residence." However, after obtaining subsidies for day care and accommodation expenses for persons with disabilities in accordance with the "People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act," family members will be assisted in placing them in non-jurisdictional institutions due to insufficient local resources. After resettlement, due to the disappearance of asset survey conditions, and the result of "no actual residence" due to resettlement in a different place, the rights and interests of citizens in the resettlement place are damaged. By sorting out the concept of social welfare, it responds to the government's responsibilities as a social welfare provider, and provides suggestions to reduce the fact that the government uses "non-administrative people" as a pretext to infringe on the rights and interests of the people.

並列關鍵字

Day Care and Residential Care Expenses Subsidy for Persons with Disabilities ； Public Assistance Act ； person not in the domicile

參考文獻

李秀如（2014）。助人者？或法規的執行者？－論社會救助資格認定下依法行政與行政裁量的衝突。新竹教育大學人文社會學報，7 （2），49-83。doi: 10.29895/ATFSAS.201409_7(2).0002

官有垣、王仕圖、杜承嶸（2019）。臺灣的工作整合型社會企業自 2000 年代中期以來的發展特色。人文社會科學研究，13 （3），1-27。doi: 10.6284/NPUSTHSSR.201909_13(3).1

林真平（2019）。身心障礙者職業重建個案管理員與支持性就業服務員的專業知識重要性及具備程度。特殊教育研究學刊，44 （1），31-57。doi: 10.6172/BSE.201903_44(1).0002

邱滿艷（2011）。從身心障礙者權益保障法探討身心障礙者需求與地方政府資源。特殊教育季刊，118，13-23。doi: 10.6217/SEQ.201103_(118).0002

研考雙月刊社會福利小組（2002）。社會福利－追求社會發展；建立福利家園。研考雙月刊，26 （6），107-121。doi: 10.6978/YKSYK.200212.0107