大專院校學生生活型態對幸福感之影響

The Influence of Lifestyles on Well-being-Case Study of College Students

許嘉甫(Chai-Fu Hsu)

《運動休閒餐旅研究》 5卷3期 (2010/09) Pp. 135-151

https://doi.org/10.29429/JSLHR.201009_5(3).08

摘要

目的：本研究旨在探討大專院校學生生活型態對幸福感之影響情形，作爲改善生活型態進而提升幸福感之依據。方法：以採叢集抽樣(cluster sampling)方式，針對10所大學校院學生進行問卷調查，共計發出問卷1000份，有效問卷共計881份，有效問卷回收率爲88.1%。本研究採用SPSS for Windows 12.0版統計套 裝軟體進行資料處理（次數分配與百分比、平均數、標準差、獨立樣本t考驗、獨立樣本單因子變異數分析、Scheffe's事後比較及典型相關分析）。結果：一、不同性別在生活型態的差異性比較，在「健康責任」、「壓力管理」和「自我實現」構面男性較側重於女性。二、不同就讀部別在生活型態的差異性比較，在「壓力管理」和「自我實現」構面，日間部較側重於進修部。三、不同年級在生活型態的差異性比較，在「健康責任」構面達到顯著的差異。四、不同性別在幸福感的差異性比較，在「自我肯定」構面，男性較側重於女性。五、不同就讀部別在幸福感的差異性比較，各個構面未達到顯著差異。六、不同就讀年級在幸福感的差異性比較，在「生活滿意」和「人際關係」構面達到顯著的差異。七、生活型態與幸福感典型相關方面，三對典型相關分析係數，達顯著水準。結論：不同背景變項在生活型態的差異性比較方面：性別、就讀部別、年級達到顯著差異。在幸福感的差異性比較方面：性別、年級達到顯著差異，且生活型態與幸福感彼此之間具有顯著相關性。

關鍵字

生活型態 ； 幸福感 ； 壓力管理 ； 生活滿意

並列摘要

Purpose: This study examines how the lifestyles of college students influence on well-being. To be a basis for improve lifestyles and also to promote well-being. Method: The questionnaire survey was conducted from ten colleges and respondents were chosen based on a cluster sampling. A total of 1000 questionnaires were distributed. 881 usable samples were obtained and resulting in a response rate of 88.1%. The survey results were summarized as descriptive statistics, Independent Samples t-Test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffe's post-hoc method and Canonical Analysis. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS 12.0 for Windows. Results: (1) Based on the comparison of gender differences in lifestyles, males were paying more attentions to the dimension of ”Duty of Health”, ”Stress Management” and ”Self-Actualization” than females. (2) Based on the comparison of divisions in lifestyles, the students of Day School were paying more attentions to the dimension of ”Stress Management” and ”Self-Actualization” than the students of Division of Continuing Education. (3) Based on the comparison of grades in lifestyles, there were significant differences in the dimension of ”Duty of Health”. (4) Based on the comparison of gender differences in well-being, males were paying more attentions to the dimension of ”Self-Affirmation” than females. (5) Based on the comparison of divisions in well-being, there were no significant differences. (6) Based on the comparison of grades in well-being, there were significant differences in the dimension of ”Life Satisfaction” and ”Interpersonal Relationship”. (7) The Canonical Analysis of ”Lifestyles” and ”Well-being” were statistical significance level. Conclusion: The results show that different demographic characteristics such as gender, divisions and grades were significant differences in lifestyles. The gender and grades were significant differences to well-being. Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between lifestyles and well-being.

並列關鍵字

Lifestyles ； Well-being ； Stress Management ； Life Satisfaction

參考文獻

丁志音(1988)。生活方式與健康─概念、倫理及政策的探討。衛生教育雜誌。4，1-43。

林子雯(1996)。成人學生多重角色與幸福感之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所。

林宗毅(1994)。台中市老年人休閒活動之研究(碩士論文)。私立東海大學企業管理研究所。

吳明隆(2000)。SPSS統計應用實務。臺北:松崗電腦圖書公司。

陳月娥(1986)。鄉村地區居民生活型態、文化參與及文化認同之研究(碩士論文)。私立東吳大學社會學研究所社會組。