師資生教師信念之縱貫性研究：以任教意願為調節變項

Teaching Willingness as a Moderator: A Longitudinal Study on Preservice Teachers' Teacher Belief

蕭佳純(Chia-Chun Hsiao)

《教育科學研究期刊》 65卷2期 (2020/06) Pp. 251-276

https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0009

摘要

在師資的養成教育過程中，對於教師信念的發展極為重要，因此，採用縱貫性研究的角度瞭解師資生的教師信念變化有其必要性。本研究以232位師資生為對象，分析教師信念的成長趨勢，以及實習時的任教意願對於教師信念的初始狀態和成長趨勢的影響。本研究在1年半期間一共進行三次調查，利用階層線性模式的統計技術，分析結果顯示：一、師資生教師信念一共有學生的管教、課程教學計畫、教學評量及學生的學習四個構面，以四個構面來看，都是呈現一線性向下的成長趨勢圖形；二、任教意願對教師信念的初始狀態具有影響；三、任教意願對於課程教學計畫、教學評量的成長趨勢有負向調節的影響，也就是說，任教意願愈高的師資生，其課程教學計畫、教學評量的下降趨勢會較緩。依據上述分析結果，本研究提出相關建議及未來研究的建議。

關鍵字

任教意願 ； 教師信念 ； 師資生 ； 縱貫性研究

並列摘要

With 232 preservice teachers as research subjects, the present study analyzed the growth trend of teacher belief and the effect of teaching willingness on the initial state and growth trend of teacher belief during practical training. The research survey was conducted three times in one and a half years. An analysis of the hierarchical statistics revealed the following: (1) Preservice teachers' teacher belief comprises four dimensions, namely student discipline, curriculum and teaching planning, teaching and evaluation, and student learning, all of which present a linear downward growth trend. (2) Teaching willingness exerts effects on the initial state of teacher belief. (3) Teaching willingness appears to negatively moderate the growth trend of curriculum and teaching planning and teaching and evaluation. In other words, preservice teachers with higher teaching willingness exhibit a slow declining trend of curriculum and teaching planning and teaching and evaluation. According to the analysis results, the paper propose relevant suggestions for education institutes/teaching practitioners and suggestions for future research.

並列關鍵字

teaching willingness ； teacher belief ； preservice teachers ； longitudinal study

參考文獻

丁學勤、廖書廷（2012）。師培生任教意願之動態性研究。師資培育與教育專業發展期刊，5（2），43-67。 【Ting, S.-C., & Liao, S.-T. (2012). A dynamic study of student teachers' teaching willingness. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 5(2), 43-67.】

朱苑瑜、葉玉珠（2003）。實習教師信念改變的影響因素之探討。師大學報：教育類，48（1），41-66。【Chu, Y.-Y., & Yeh, Y.-C. (2003). A study of influential factors to student teachers' belief change. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Education, 48(1), 41-66.】

梁鳳珠（2012）。教師教學信念之影響因素分析。教育研究論壇，3（2），157-172。【Liang, F.-C. (2012). A study of teacher's teaching belief. Forum of Education Research, 3(2), 157-172.】

陳國泰、曾佳珍（2005）。準幼兒教師教學信念的發展之個案研究。幼兒保育學刊，3，1-30。【Chen, K.-T., & Tseng, C.-C. (2005). A case study on the development of preschool pre-service teacher's teaching beliefs. Journal of Child Care, 3, 1-30.】

曾素秋（2008）。九年一貫課程設計理念與國中教師教育信念研究─以中彰投四縣市國中教師為例。朝陽人文社會學刊，6（2），197-253。【Jseng, S.-C. (2008). The research of grade 1-9 curriculum conception and junior high school teachers' educational beliefs. Chaoyang Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(2), 197-253.】