透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.144.45.137
  • 期刊

公務員服務法第13條之立法論、解釋論與適用論上疑義-從一個實務案例出發

The Doubts Derived from the Article 13 of Government Servant Service Law and the Case Study

摘要


長久以來公務員服務法一直為學者所詬病,除了不確定法律概念過多,規範明確性不足外,不合時宜或道德性條文更使公務員陷入無所適從之困境,造成是否觸法往往任由當權者解釋。本文從一個真實案例中發現公務員服務法第13條立法論之錯誤及行政機關解釋論及適用論之恣意,造成公務員曾擔任營利事業負責人後考取公職竟然面臨停職之命運,此種情輕法重之立法上怠惰、行政上恣意之情形實有改善檢討之必要,本文從立法論、解釋論及適用論探求相關疑義,希冀作為將來人事實務上之參考。

並列摘要


The Government Servant Service Law has long been criticized by scholars. In addition to the uncertain legal concepts, specification clarity inadequate, outdated or unethical provisions make civil servants into the plight and rely on those in power to interpret the law. This article attempt to discuss a real case derived from errors and reckless behavior of administrative authorities when interpreting the Article 13 of Government Servant Service Law via applying interpretation and applicable theories. The consequences results the person who used to serve as the person in charge of a profit-seeking enterprise unqualified to be a civil servant after obtaining the qualification to serve in the government. Such laziness and reckless law making procedure and administration must be improved. Therefore, this article addresses the doubts and conflicts of law from the viewpoints of legislation, interpretation and applicable theories and hopefully, this discussion could be the references for future personnel practices.

參考文獻


王澤鑑,2009,《法律思維與民法案例》,台北,自版。
朱武獻,2007,《人事行政法制論文集》,台北:三民。
吳庚,2003,《憲法的解釋與適用》,台北:自版。
吳庚,2012,《行政法之理論與實用》(12版),台北:三民。
吳志光,2012,《行政法》(5版),台北:新學林。

延伸閱讀