北宋政爭幕後操盤手之探討

歷來對於「政爭」的形成，往往都被指稱是朝臣在權益的爭奪或權柄的掌握上所產生的問題，甚至影響國家的興衰均算在他們的頭上。然而，一個國家掌握權力機器的卻是國君，政爭的形成多則是帝王默許的結果。以北宋而言，幾次著名的政爭都與國君本身的意圖有關，朝臣可以說是為國君分憂為國家解之於倒懸，然若無國君的支持，這些打著改革旗號的政治理想如何成形？又何來黨同伐異。因此，筆者以為造成政爭的最主要關鍵，這幕後的操盤手便是一國之君。

關鍵字

北宋；政爭；操縱者

並列摘要

Since the history of the ＂political struggle＂ in form, Often alleged to be in the interests of courtiers compete or lawful right grasping produces question, even affects the prosperity and decline national to calculate on theirs head. However, A national grasping authority machine is actually a monarch, The formation of political struggle is the result of a multi-emperor acquiesced. By the Northern Song Dynasty, Several famous political struggles all with monarch itself intention related, The royal courtier may say is shares sorrow for the monarch for the country relieves the crisis, if non-monarch's support, how do these flaunt the reform banner politics to be ideal forms? how can there be partisan. Therefore, I think that the main cause of critical political struggle, behind this manipulator is a country's crowned head.