加拿大身體素養評量第二版問卷在臺灣的驗證

緒論：為了學童未來長遠的健康與幸褔，具備身體素養，降低少動久坐的習慣，是當今學童教育重要課題之一，因此，各國積極推動身體素養，並積極開發有效的身體素養評量工具。本研究的目的是將加拿大身體素養評量第二版（CAPL-2）的問卷部分翻譯編修成為臺灣版CAPL-2中文問卷，以符合臺灣語境，以臺灣學童為樣本，驗證其信效度。方法：使用專家效度將CAPL-2問卷翻譯編修成臺灣版CAPL-2中文問卷，然後對桃園地區二所國小34班511位三至六年級學童（8-12歲）進行施試，獲得479份有效問卷（男= 264，55.1%、女 = 215，44.9%）。所得數據透過試題分析、內部一致性信度分析、相關係數之同質性檢驗、與驗證式因素分析，檢驗臺灣版CAPL-2中文問卷是否具有良好的信效度。結果：1.認知和理解部分：內部一致性信度佳（α = .70）；選擇與填充題的試題分析難度指數符合標準，鑑別度顯示試題品質優良。2.動機和信心部分：內部一致性信度良好（α=.92）與相關係數之同質性檢驗皆顯示中、高度相關；驗證式因素分析模型CFI = .95；TLI = .93；RMSEA = .087；SRMR = .053，模型建構信度良好；聚斂效度的因素負荷量與變異數抽取量（AVE）皆在標準以上；區別效度的AVE最小值大於整構面間相關係數最大值的平方，故理論模式的內在品質佳。結論：整體而言，本研究已證明臺灣版CAPL-2中文問卷具信效度，可以提供給國內從事CAPL-2研究之初步證據。

關鍵字

身體素養；久坐；認知和理解；動機和信心

並列摘要

Introduction: For the long-term health and happiness of school children, this is an important issue in today's education that helps school children have physical literacy and reduce the habit of being sedentary. Therefore, countries around the world promote the concept of physical literacy and develop effective physical literacy assessment tools. The purpose of this study was to compile the questionnaire of the second edition of the Canadian physical literacy assessment (CAPL-2) into the Taiwan version, to conform to the Taiwanese context. After that, test its validity and reliability, using Taiwanese schoolchildren as a sample. Method: This study is edited for the Taiwanese version of the CAPL-2 questionnaire through expert validity. After that, a total of 511 primary school children aged 8-11 years old in two primary schools in Taoyuan Area were tested, and 479 valid questionnaires were obtained (male = 264, 55.1%, female = 215, 44.9%). The obtained data are tested by test item analysis, internal consistency reliability analysis, homogeneity test of correlation coefficient, and confirmatory factor analysis to test whether the Taiwan version of the CAPL-2 Chinese questionnaire has good reliability and validity. Results: 1. Knowledge and Understanding: The Internal consistency reliability of the Taiwan version of CAPL-2 questionnaire is acceptable (α = .70); the item difficulty index of the multiple choice question and blank filling question of the Taiwan version of CAPL-2 questionnaire are fine. Item Discrimination shows that the quality of the Taiwan version of CAPL-2 questionnaire is excellent. 2.Motivation and Confidence: Internal consistency reliability (α = .92) and item discrimination are fine; confirmatory factor analysis which CFI = .95; TLI = .93; RMSEA = 0.087; SRMR = 0.053, Construct Reliability is fine; the factor loadings of the convergent validity and the average variance extracted (AVE) is above standard; the minimum value of the AVE of discriminant validity is greater than the square of the maximum value of the correlation coefficient between the whole dimension, so the intrinsic quality of the theoretical model is good. Conclusion: Overall, this study has proved that the Taiwan version of CAPL-2 questionnaire has reliability and validity, and can provide reference in future study in assessment of physical literacy in Taiwan.

並列關鍵字

Physical Literacy ； Sedentary ； Knowledge and Understanding ； Motivation and Confidence

參考文獻

Corbin, C. B. (2016). Implications of physical literacy for research and practice: Commentary. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 87(1), 14-27. http://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2016.1124722.

Chen, A. (2015). Operationalizing physical literacy for learners: embodying the motivation to move. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 4(2), 125-131. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2015.03.005

Delisle Nyström, C., Traversy, G., Barnes, J. D., Chaput, J. P., Longmuir, P. E., & Tremblay, M. S. (2018). Associations between domains of physical literacy by weight status in 8- to 12-year-old Canadian children. BMC Public Health 18:1043. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5898-3

Durden-Myers, E. J., Whitehead, M. E., & Pot, N. (2018). Physical literacy and human flourishing. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37(3), 308-311. http://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0132

Edwards, L. C., Bryant, A. S., Keegan, R. J., Morgan, K., Cooper, S. M., & Jones, A. M. (2018). Measuring’ physical literacy and related constructs: A systematic review of empirical findings. Sports Medicine, 48(3), 659-682. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0817-9

主題瀏覽