本文最主要的目的為瞭解美國國家教學專業標準董事會(NBPTS)之標準,對國內體育教師專業評鑑指標之啓示,乃蒐集NBPTS的標準及國內體育教師專業評鑑之指標,透過文獻的探討並比較兩者之差異,比較結果如下:NBPTS致力於教育改革上,其最主要的目的為維持教師高度品質及達到最嚴格的標準,而這些標準都說明了「教師所應具備的知識及教師所能做到的事情」,其具體的標準有13個,每一個標準都具體說明教師所需要達到的內容,反觀,國內體育教師專業評鑑指標的內容中,沒有任何指標能夠符合NBPTS的「主動的生活形態」及「與大學合作」等二個標準,在其他部分,雖有部分指標符合NBPTS的內涵,但並非全部符合,尚有不足之處。以下則提出幾點建議: 一、新增「主動生活形態」及「與大學合作」之指標 二、參考國外專業固體之標準去建立體育教師評鑑指標 王、建立具體可行之體育教師評鑑指標
The aim of this study was to find some advices to the professional indicators of physical education teachers from National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. The documents about NBPTS and the professional indicators of physical education teachers in Taiwan were collected and analyzed by the author. The results of this study were 1) the purpose, in educational reform, of NBPTS was to maintain high and rigorous standards for what accomplished teachers should know and be able to do. 2) there were 13 standards of accomplished practice for physical educations, knowledge of students, knowledge of subject matter, sound teaching practices, student engagement in learning, high expectation for learners, learning environment, curricular choices, assessment, equity fairness and diversity, reflective practice and professional growth, promotion an active lifestyle, collaboration with colleagues, and family and community partnerships. In opposition, the professional indicators of physical education teachers in Taiwan didn't match all in two parts of NBPTS, promotion an active lifestyle and collaboration with colleagues, and just confirmed some in other parts. Some advices bellowing will be provided. 1) Adding some indicators of promotion an active lifestyle, and collaboration with colleagues. 2) Consulting the standards from the professional committee, like NBPTS, to construct the evaluative indicators of physical education teacher. 3) Building observable and measurable indicators of physical education teacher.