台灣水域休閒之研究趨勢分析

Trend Analysis of Taiwan Water Leisure Research

高錦勝 ； 方信淵 ； 李委珈

《休閒運動保健學報》 3期 (2010/12) Pp. 116-131

https://doi.org/10.6204/JRSHP.2010.03.11

摘要

本研究以內容分析法搜尋與水域休閒相關之學術文獻並進行分析，將所搜集到的文獻以計量方式進行整理與歸納，個別分析年代篇數、篇目類別、刊物及論文發表系所學群、研究方法等面向，藉以探索臺灣水域休閒之研究趨勢。研究範圍以國內期刊及博碩士論文之電子資料庫為搜尋文獻之來源，以國家圖書館期刊文獻資訊網中文期刊篇目索引及博碩士論文資訊網所提供學術論文為範圍，並以關鍵片語合進行搜尋。研究結果顯示在期刊方面計有222篇、博碩士論文方面計148篇。若以年代來區分，綜合期刊文章及博碩士論文整體年代研究趨勢，以2001至2005年間是研究趨勢瞬增的起點，而此一區間研究篇目類別部份以區域研究及地理類占31%為最多，管理學類占28%為次多；刊物及系所學群部份以體育類占42%為最多，管理類占19%為次多；研究方法部份，以質化占52%為最多，量化占45%為次多。若以篇目類別來區分，綜合期刊文章及博碩士論文整體類目研究趨勢來分析，則以心理學、管理學各29%為最大宗，其次則為區域研究及地理類目28%居次。若以系所學群來區分，綜合期刊文章及博碩士論文整體學群研究趨勢來分析，則體育學群以研究期刊論文與博碩論文總數量中的42%為最高，其次則為管理學群19%、生物資源學群13%居後。若以研究方法來區分，期刊文章與博碩士論文兩類所占研究方法比率有相反之現象，期刊文章以質化研究為多，博碩士論文則以量化研究為多，主要原因系期刊所刊載文章內容以論述性質為多，而博碩士論文皆以實證性調查研究及個案研究為多，因此形成比重相反之現象。總結仍以量化研究為最普遍之研究方法。

關鍵字

水域休閒 ； 研究趨勢

並列摘要

In this study, we use content analysis for the research, the literature collected to measure the way to collate and summarize, analyze individual's number of articles, table of contents categories, publications, and publication by the Department of Science group, and research methods for, in order to explore the trends of Taiwan water leisure research. We use keyword mix to search the paper, and deduct the papers which duplication and non-related ones, and finally in regard include 222 journals, thesis regard include the 148. In terms of years to distinguish, comprehensive journal articles and research trends Repository whole years, to between 2001 and 2005 is the starting point of the growing trend of instantaneous, and this type of part of a range of table of contents to regional studies and geography classes accounted for 31% of up, management class, 28% for the second and more; Publications and Department of Sports Science group for the most part to a maximum of 42%, management 19% for the second and more; research methods part of the qualitative account for 52% of Most, 45% for the second quantization over. In terms of categories to distinguish between table of contents, comprehensive journal articles and Repository as a whole category of trends analysis, Zeyi psychology, management, each 29% for the largest, followed by regional studies and geography Category 28% subordination. If the school system to distinguish between groups, integrated science journal articles and Repository as a whole group of trend analysis, the physical education group to study the journal papers and Doctoral 42% of the total amount for the highest, followed by management group 19%, biological resources, home school groups, after 13%. In terms of research methods to distinguish, journal articles and research methods Repository percentage ratio of two opposite phenomena, journal articles and more qualitative research, quantitative study Repository Zeyi more, the main reason given by the Department of journal articles to discuss the nature of the content more than the Repository tailor empirical research and case studies and more, so the proportion of the opposite phenomenon of the formation. Conclusion is still the most common of quantitative research methods.

並列關鍵字

Water leisure ； trends of research