透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.218.169.50
  • 期刊

傳統教學與網路教學對羽球知識及動作技能學習成就之影響

Effects of Traditional and Network Teaching Modes on Badminton Skills Achievements

摘要


本研究旨在比較三種不同教學法(傳統教學法、網路教學法、傳統加網路教學法)對羽球知識及動作技能學習成就之影響。研究中的「傳統教學法」是以教師講解、示範、糾正、師生回饋的指導方式進行教學;「網路教學法」是通過網際網路教學影帶放映,學生觀看自學方式進行學習;「傳統加網路教學法」是以教師指導並配合網際網路進行教學。參與研究對象為60位本校二專女生,依前測成績高低平均分成三組,各組以不同教學法進行六週教學,最後再施以後測來了解各組學習成就之差異。羽球知識測驗以試卷測驗,測驗成績採用共變數統計分析以了解各組變異情形;羽球動作技能學習成就採用單因子變異數分析統計方法考驗各組差異情形,再以t考驗進行事後比較。並以半結構式訪談了解學生對教學方式的學習態度。本研究結果顯示:一、羽球知識學習成就中,三種教學法並無顯著差異。二、羽球動作技能學習成就中,「傳統教學法」及「傳統加網路教學法」優於「網路教學法」。三、學生較認同以「傳統教學法」或「傳統加網路教學法」教學方式進行教學。此結果說明羽球知識學習可以各種教學法進行學習;但羽球動作技能學習則以「傳統教學加網路教學」之學習成就較佳。由本研究結果得知,網路教學可能因研究時間限制而影響羽球動作技能學習成就,但在實際教學中同時採用傳統教學及網路教學,有助於羽球知識及動作技能學習成就之提升。

並列摘要


Three teaching modes were studied (traditional, network, and combination of the two) to evaluate the elevation of the knowledge and motor skills in badminton from 60 female college students (18-19 years old), whom were divided into three groups by pre-test, and then taught by three different modes for six weeks. After six weeks, the achievement was examined for knowledge and motor skills separately. Data were collected and analyzed. Results of this study show: (1) Traditional combined network teaching mode was the favorite teaching mode. (2) From ANCOVA, there were no significant differences (p< .05) in knowledge elevation of badminton by these three teaching modes. (3) From one-way ANOVA and t-test analyzed, traditional and traditional combined with network teaching mode were better than network teaching mode alone in motor skills elevation, but there were no significant differences between traditional and traditional combined with network teaching mode. These results indicated that network teaching mode could improve the knowledge of badminton, but could not in motor skills elevation since it need much time to mimic and to practice. Although the time-limited for network teaching, it is still a helpful tool to combined with traditional teaching to improve the skills of badminton.

延伸閱讀