透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.134.102.182
  • 期刊

高雄市民之文化資本對藝文看法與藝文發展評估之影響

The Impacts of Cultural Capital of Kaohsiung Residents upon Their Ways of Seeing Art and Cultural Development

摘要


立基於Bourdieu的文化區異觀點,本研究以大高雄地區電話問卷調查為基礎,實證檢驗文化資本如何影響民眾對藝文發展的認知與態度,希望凸顯文化美學的階級權力運作面向。統計結果發現,文化資本與階級認同確實影響民眾對文化區異的看法,也導致民眾對政府推廣文創產業的作法抱持不同的立場,經濟資本則幾乎毫無影響力。整體而言,民眾肯定高雄的藝文發展有明顯的進步,但是多半評估南北的藝文差距並未縮小,因此期待高雄市政府未來將文創產業的推動列為重要的施政目標。

並列摘要


Focusing upon the impacts of cultural capital and class identity, this study uses the case of Kaohsiung to explore into the ways of Kaohsiung residents to see art and cultural development. Data have been collected through a city-wide telephone random survey and analyzed from the perspective of Pierre Bourdieu to sort out the causes and consequences of different viewpoints regarding cultural issues. Statistic analyses show that, to some extent, cultural standpoints have been the result of the symbolic violence of class power. Higher cultural and social capitals, according to regression analyses, are more likely to encourage local art production and consumption, as well as grant priority and support to municipal policies of cultural industries. However, those who pay little attention to the importance of cultural development tend to be younger and higher class identification. Overall speaking, Kaohsiung residents recognize cultural progress which had been made in these years, but still feel unsatisfied with the status quo and the cultural gap between Taipei and Kaohsiung.

延伸閱讀