透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.129.69.151
  • 期刊

從校園課室到戶外場域-污水處理解說方案應用於國小學童教學之比較

From the Campus to the Outdoor Field - A study of the Sewage Treatment Interpretation Scheme Applied in Classroom Teaching and Field Teaching on the Environmental Quality of Primary School Students

摘要


本研究主要探討不同教學環境中置入污水處理解說方案,對於國小中年級學生環境知識、環境態度及環境行為之比較。以高雄市國小中年級學生為研究對象,取實驗組及對照組各4班(共計166位,男生87人;女生79人)進行研究。實驗組於傳統課室、對照組則至戶外污水處理廠,均接受污水處理解說方案。實驗教學前、後,使用研究者編制污水處理環境素養量表(Chronbach α值達.89)進行施測,根據所獲資料以獨立樣本t檢定、成對t檢定進行資料分析。研究結果顯示,學生於校園課室中實施污水處理解說方案後,僅在環境知識面表現顯著高於前測(p<.05),環境態度與環境行為層面之前後測未達顯著差異;而本研究中學生於污水處理廠場域中接受污水處理解說方案後,學生的環境知識、環境態度、環境行為三個面向,前後測均達顯著差異(p<.05)。由此顯示,戶外真實場域的教學與體驗可有效提升學生的環境知識、環境態度及環境行為。

並列摘要


This study mainly explores the comparison of environmental knowledge, environmental attitudes and environmental behaviors among middle and primary school students in different teaching environments. Taking the junior middle school students of Kaohsiung City as the research object, the quasi-experimental design study was adopted. Four classes of the experimental group and the control group (166 in total, 87 boys and 79 girls) were studied. The experimental group received the sewage treatment and interpretation program in the traditional classroom and the control group to the outdoor sewage. Before and after the experiment, the researchers used the Sewage Treatment Environmental Literacy Scale (Chronbachα value up to .89) to conduct the test. According to the obtained data, the data were analyzed by independent sample t-test and paired t-test. The results show that after the implementation of the sewage treatment interpretation program in the campus classroom, the students only performed significantly higher than the pre-test on the environmental knowledge level, and the environmental attitude and environmental behavior level did not reach significant difference before and after the test; After receiving the sewage treatment and interpretation program in the field, the students' environmental knowledge, environmental attitudes and environmental behaviors were three aspects, and the results were significantly different. This shows that the teaching and experience of the outdoor real field can effectively improve students' environmental knowledge, environmental attitudes and environmental behavior.

參考文獻


王鑫(2014)。概說戶外教育的要點。學校體育,140,84-92。
何穗青(2012)。國小學生實施水資源環境教育之學習成效─以嘉義縣大林國小為例。南華大學休閒環境管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義。
吳鈴筑、張子超(2017)。探討公私部門環境教育設施場所認證之發展概況:以100至104年間資料為例。環境教育研究,13(1),99-136。
汪靜明(2000)。大甲溪水資源環境教育。經濟部水資源局,國立台灣師範大學環境教育中心,台北市。
周宜毅(2012)。在地吸引力、旅遊動機與導覽解說對遊客用心體驗影響之探討以台江國家公園為例。國立成功大學海洋科技與事務研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南。

延伸閱讀