透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.138.223
  • 期刊

體育課情境樂趣因素結構檢驗──內在樂趣及情境樂趣之觀點

The Development of Situational Interest Scale in Physical Education Class

摘要


本研究的主要目的在檢驗體育課情境樂趣的因素結構,以建立探討體育課樂趣的基礎。以林季燕、季力康與劉義群(2003)發展的體育課動機量表,以及Chen, Darst, and Pangrazi(1999)發展的體育課情境樂趣量表為藍本,以台中縣四所國中體育課教學為情境,380位國中學生為研究參與者,問卷有效回收率為84%,進行量表的因素結構檢驗。結果顯示,經因素分析,獲得「成就的樂趣、運動特質樂趣與專注的樂趣」三個因素,可解釋之總變異量為65.82%,各因素間的相關從低到中等(r=.02-.62),內部一致性良好(Cronbach's α=.75-.91)。進一步以檢驗自覺體育課運動量在體育課樂趣上的差異,發現不同的自覺體育課運動量在「成就的樂趣和運動特質樂趣」因素的差異達顯著水準(p<.05);但在「專注的樂趣」因素上的差異並未達穩定水準(p>.05)。結論為初步確認成就的樂趣、運動特質樂趣以及專注的樂趣,是體育課樂趣的三個因素結構。

關鍵字

體育課 體育教學 內在樂趣

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was based on Lin, Chi, and Liu’s work (2003) on the Motivation in Physical Education Classes Scale and Chen, Darst, and Pangrazi’s work (1999) on the Situational Interest in Physical Education Classes Scale, to develop construction of the Situational Interest Scale in Physical Education Classes a scale. Method: Junior high school participants (n=380) were from Taichung county and completed the scale, the questionnaire effective returns-ratio are 84%. Then, we examined construction of the scale. Result: After factor analyzing, the scale obtains three factors including interest of achievement, interest of sport characters, and interest of concentration. Altogether, there was 65.82% of the variability. The correlations between the factors were .02 to .62, appeared low to moderately correlation. The scale have good internal consistency, Cronbach' s α is .75 to .91. Further, we examined the different between loading in physical education class and interest in physical education classes. Found that loading in physical education classes is significant different in two factors, interest of achievement and interest of sport characters, but not significant in interest of concentration. Conclusion: The preliminary confirmed that interest of physical education classes is construct by three factors, interest of achievement, interest of characters and interest of concentration.

參考文獻


王保進(2004)。視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究(第二版)。台北市:心理。
林季燕、季力康(2003)。運動動機量表之編制信度與效度分析,台灣運動心理學報,2,15-32。
林季燕、季力康、劉義群(2003)。體育課動機量表之信度與效度分析 。論文發表於中華民國大專院校九十二年度體育學術研討會。桃園縣:國立體育學院。
林章榜、吳海助(2006)。體育課情境樂趣結構檢驗。論文發表於台灣運動教育學會年會暨學術研討會。台北市:台灣師範大學。
邱皓政(2004)。量化研究與統計分析。台北市:五南。

延伸閱讀