政府國防廉潔指標之補償契約策略研究

A Research on Offset Strategy of Government Defense Integrity Index

曹耀鈞(Yao Chun Tsao) ； 蕭宏金(Luke Hsiao)

《政策與人力管理》 11卷1期 (2020/06) Pp. 1-14

https://doi.org/10.29944/PPM.202006_11(1).0001

摘要

分析台灣政府國防廉潔指標（GDI）評比在二○一三及二○一五年兩次評鑑，國防部都獲得「B」級（低度貪腐風險）評等，但其中採購面向由二○一三年的「B」級下降成2015年的「C」級，而有關補償契約（Offset）題項，確實為評鑑內容中的整備弱項。因應二○一九新式評鑑的重點特色，本研究提出建議包括：1.訂定明確的補償契約法規與政策。2.廠商的法遵及反貪條款要求。3.內外部審計單位的積極介入。4.補償契約有權審核官員的反貪訓練及要求其對執行中的合約做必要管控。5.適度的合約資訊揭露並鼓勵多方面的廠商競標。6.明訂主合約和子合約的違約相關罰則，並切實執行。

關鍵字

國際透明組織 ； 補償契約 ； CPI ； GDI ； GI

並列摘要

We analyze the Government Defense Integrity Index (GDI) rating in 2013 and 2015. Ministry of Defense of the Republic of China (Taiwan) has been rated in Band ＂B＂ (low corruption risk), but the sub index about procurement is downgraded from Band B in 2013 to the Band ＂C＂ in 2015. The items on the offset contract is indeed a weak point in the evaluation. In response to the key features of the 2019 new style evaluation, the recommendations proposed in this study include: 1. Establish definite regulations and policies of offset contract. 2. The necessity for the manufacturer to comply with anti-corruption provisions. 3. Aggressive involvement of internal and external audit units. 4. Anti-corruption training for the officials who has the right to review the offset contract; and to perform necessary control over the offset contract under execution. 5. Appropriate contract reveals and various vendors to bid. 6. Clearly stipulate the penalties related to breach of the main contract and sub-contracts and implement them effectively.

並列關鍵字

Transparency International ； Offset Contract ； CPI ； GDI ； GI