高關懷少年社會工作方案介入成效之比較研究

A comparative study on the effect of the intervention of the social work plan of high risk juvenile

陳振盛(CHEN, CHEN SHENG)

《全人教育集刊》 7期 (2021/05) Pp. 1-25

https://doi.org/10.6689/BHE.202105_(7).0001

摘要

本研究以高關懷或高危機之青少年作為主要研究對象。整個研究持續三年，因第一年只是配合機構的服務，因此沒有蒐集相關資料，真正有系統的研究規劃和資料蒐集是第二年和第三年。實務運作上依機構之服務計畫配合機構，最後比較了第二年和第三年之研究結果。研究結果顯示，第二年只做單一團體社會工作，效果不明顯，即使有些變項達到顯著差異，結果也難評估。第二年則依據矯正有效論的文獻與相關學者之意見做了修正，結果顯示在主動、衝動處理、學業學習都有達到顯著性進步，且在攻擊行為上都有達到顯性下降，老師和同儕同學對其行為之評估也達到顯著性之進步。研究結果支持了Ross & Gendreau,（1980）;Wilson（1980）；Gendreau（1996）的論點，認為對行為偏差有效的處置最好是綜合性的處置，而且是多面向的處置計畫。

關鍵字

青少年 ； 團體社會工作 ； 高危機 ； 偏差行為

並列摘要

In this study, high care for young people as the research object. The study lasted three years, the first year in conjunction with the service programmers of social institutions, did not collect relevant data, and truly systematic research planning and data collection were the second and third years. The results show that the second year only to do single-group social work, the effect is not obvious, even if some of the changes to achieve significant differences, the results are difficult to assess. In the second year, according to the literature of corrective effective theory and the opinions of relevant scholars, the results showed that there was significant progress in activation, conflict-solving and academic learning, and there was a significant decline in aggression, and the evaluation of their behavior by teachers and peer students also achieved significant progress. The results of the study supported Ross & Gendreau, (1980); Wilson (1980); Gendreau (1996) argues that effective disposal of delinquency is best dealt with as a comprehensive treatment and is a multi-oriented disposal plan.

並列關鍵字

juvenile ； group social work ； high risk ； delinquency