中國大陸對外政策之部門多元化及行動邏輯－比較胡時期「釣魚臺爭端」與習時期「薩德爭端」

Departmental Diversification and Action Logic of China's Foreign Policy - Comparing the ＂Diaoyutai Dispute＂ in Hu's Period and the ＂THAAD Dispute＂ in the Xi's Period

張娟瑄(Chang, Chuan-Hsuan)

《發展與前瞻學報》 25期 (2019/09) Pp. 29-46

https://doi.org/10.6737/JDP.201909_(25).02

摘要

本文主要探討隨著中國大陸改革開放、經貿實力提升並強化與各國多元關係情況下，其對外外政策之運作會否出現部門多元化情形？而相關部門之運作邏輯為何？本文比較胡錦濤時期－2010、2012年的兩次「釣魚臺爭端」及習近平時期－2016年的「薩德爭端」案例，試分析中共在對東亞國家的外交施壓作為及相關部門運作邏輯與差異性。觀察發現，隨著中國大陸的國家實力愈趨提升，將有助其發展與周邊國家更趨深入且多元化之關係，中共在應處相關外交關係時擁有更多政策工具；而另方面，習近平因相對前任胡錦濤在政治地位上更趨穩固，其也更能促相關部門協助其對有關國家施壓，落實其對外政策目的。因此，相對胡時期的「釣魚臺爭端」之部門多元化及行動邏輯，習近平領導時期的「薩德爭端」除同樣展現對外政策的部門多元化情形，相關部門之運作也更具一致性、迎合中共中央所需。

關鍵字

分裂式威權主義 ； 中日關係 ； 中韓關係 ； 中國對外政策

並列摘要

This article mainly discusses whether the operation of foreign and foreign policies will be diversified in the context of China's reform and opening up, economic and trade strength, and strengthening of multi-national relations with countries. What is the operational logic of the relevant departments? This paper compares the two ＂Diaoyutai disputes＂ during the Hu Jintao period-2010 and 2012 and the ＂THAAD dispute＂ in the Xi Jinping period-2016, and analyzes the CCP's diplomatic pressure on East Asian countries as the logic and difference in the operation of relevant departments. Observed that with the increasing national strength of mainland China, it will help its development to deepen and diversify with neighboring countries. The CCP has more policy tools when it comes to relevant diplomatic relations. On the other hand, Xi Jinping Because Hu Jintao has become more stable in terms of political status, he has also been able to promote relevant departments to help them put pressure on the countries concerned and implement their foreign policy objectives. Therefore, in contrast to the sector diversification and operational logic of the Diaoyutai dispute in the Hu's period, the ＂THAAD dispute＂ during the leadership of Xi Jinping not only showed the diversification of the foreign policy, but also the operation of the relevant departments was more consistent and catered to the CCP leader's needs.

並列關鍵字

Fragmented Authoritarianism ； Sino-Japan Relation ； Sino-Korean Relation ； China Diplomacy

參考文獻

1 Robert Dahl, Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City（New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961）。

2 David Shambaugh, “Introduction,” in David Shambaugh ed., American Studies of Contemporary China (Aromonk: N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 1993), pp.3~5.

3 A. Doak Barnett, Communist China in Perspective（New York: Praeger, 1962）

Michel Oksenberg, “Policy Making Under Mao, 1949~68: An Overview,” in John M. H. Lindbeck ed., China: Management of a Revolutionary Society（Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1971）, pp. 79∼115

4 林佳龍、徐斯儉，〈導論：退化的極權主義與中國大陸未來發展〉，《未來中國大陸：退化的極權》（台北：時報文化出版社，2004 年），頁 11-30