A Theoretical Analysis of the Diaoyu Islands Disputes from the Perspective of Pure Theory of Law

梁志建(Zhi-Jian Liang)

《Issues & Studies》 49卷1期 (2013/03) Pp. 179-212

https://doi.org/10.7033/ISE.201303_49(1).0006

並列摘要

The current study attempts to analyze the issue of the Diaoyu Islands based on relevant historical facts according the methods of scholars of the Vienna School of Jurisprudence, as represented by Hans Kelsen, originator of the Pure Theory of Law. Although leading scholars of the Vienna School of Jurisprudence, represented by Kelsen did not experienced disputing the issue, Kelsen dealt with the case both directly in the material sense and indirectly in the formal sense, as well as in an abstract way. After a preliminary application of the Pure Theory of Law to a legal analysis of the case, it can be concluded that the Diaoyu Islands ought not belong to Japan. This shows that there is, to some extent, a backward-glancing aspect to Kelsenian theory. Kelsen's Pure Theory of Law may help us reach a further abstract understanding of human interaction in this ”world village” as it evolves into Kelsen's ideal of a ”world state” showing a forward-looking aspect of Pure Theory of Law.

並列關鍵字

Pure Theory of Law ； Hans Kelsen ； Vienna School of Jurisprudence ； international law ； Diaoyu Islands

參考文獻

Anonymous. 1944. The Second Historical Archive of China, total file, no. 18, subfile, no. 2987

Bederman, David J.(2006).Appraising A Century of Scholarship in the American Journal of International Law.American Journal of International Law.100(1),20-63.

Blanchard, Jean-Marc F.(2000).The U.S. Role in the Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu (Senkaku) Islands, 1945-197 l.China Quarterly.161,95-123.

Bluntschli, J. C. 1878. Das Moderne Völkerrecht der Civilisierten Staten (Modem International Law of Civilized Nations), 3rd ed. Nördlingen: Verlag der C.H. Beck'schen Buchhandlung

邵玉銘(1991)。風雲的年代：保釣運動及留學生涯之回憶。Taipei:聯經=Linking Books。