透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.14.80.45
  • 期刊

幼兒教保服務人員工作壓力與工作壓力因應策略量表信、效度及潛在影響關係之檢驗

Examining the Reliability and Validity of Scales of Job Stress and Stress-coping Strategies for Early Childhood Education and Care Staff and Their Latent Effects

摘要


回顧工作壓力與工作壓力因應策略的相關研究,可發現當前相關研究存在的四個主要問題:測量的精簡性與效度不足,忽略工作壓力對工作壓力因應各向度間不一致的影響關係,較少檢視幼兒園師生比對工作壓力與工作壓力因應間關係的影響,以及在運用統計分析方法上的限制。有鑑於此,本研究分別以192位和208位幼兒教保服務人員為預試和正式研究對象,採用驗證性因素分析與結構方程模式取向的潛在調節效果分析,主要目的在於修訂工作壓力與工作壓力因應策略量表,提供建構效度證據,並進一步探究班級師生比對幼兒教保服務人員工作壓力與工作壓力因應策略間關係的影響。本研究發現:(1)10題精簡版四向度工作壓力量表與9題精簡版三向度工作壓力因應策略量表,能以少於過去相關測量一半以上的題項,提供良好的信度和建構效度;(2)不同工作壓力來源對不同因應策略具有不一致的影響;(3)低師生比反而會加劇部分工作壓力對因應策略的負向影響,與過去研究發現大相逕庭。本研究於文末根據研究結果,針對未來研究與教學實務,分別提出相應建議。

並列摘要


After reviewing the literature related to job stress and stress-coping strategies, four problems were found: (a) low parsimony and validity of their measurements; (b) ignoring inconsistent relationships among different dimensions of job stress and stress-coping strategies; (c) few researches examining the effect of teacher-student ratio on these relationships; (d) the limitations of statistical analysis methods. As a result, this study recruited 192 and 208 early childhood education and care staff as pre-survey and formal survey subjects respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis and latent moderation analysis were conducted. The main purposes of this study were twofold: (a) to revise the scales of job stress and stress-coping strategies for early childhood education and care staff, and to provide evidences for reliability and validity; (b) to investigate the effect of teacher-student ratio on the relationships among job stress and stress-coping strategies. Results showed that: (a) ten-item and nine-item short version of four dimensional job stress scale and three dimensional stress-coping strategies scale provided good reliability and validity, with more than half items fewer than former measurements; (b) inconsistent effects of job stress on stress-coping strategies were found; (c) contradictory to former findings, teacher-student ratio accelerated the negative effect of job stress on stress-coping strategies. This article also gave suggestions for further research and practices.

參考文獻


毛國楠(1996)。〈國中教師的樂觀信念、自我效能、對壓力的認知評估、因應方式與工作調適及身心健康的關係〉。《教育心理學報》,第 28 期,頁 177–193。doi: 10.6251/BEP.19960901.7
周俊良、李新民、許籃憶(2005)。〈學前階段特殊教育教師因應策略與工作壓力之相關研究〉。《特殊教育學報》,第 21 期,頁 79–102。doi: 10.6768/JSE.200507.0079
高旭繁、陸洛(2011)。〈工作壓力及其後果的組群差異:以 OSI 模式為理論基礎之大樣本分析〉。《臺大管理論叢》,第 22 卷第 1 期,頁 239–272。doi: 10.6226/NTURM2011.22.1.239
高鳳霞、鄭伯壎(2014)。〈職場工作壓力:回顧與展望〉。《人力資源管理學報》,第 14 卷第 1 期,頁 77–101。doi: 10.6147/JHRM.2014.1401.04
莊淑灣、呂錘卿(2005)。〈中部地區國民小學主任工作壓力與因應方式之研究〉。《臺中教育大學學報:教育類》,第 19 卷第 2 期,頁 127–150。doi: 10.7037/JNTUE.200512.0127

延伸閱讀