- 期刊
異文的類型分析與藏經的源流考辨－以《集沙門不應拜俗等事》諸本對勘為例
An Analysis of the Types of Variant Readings and an Investigation into the Origins of the Canons: Taking the Collation of the Various Editions of Ji shamen buying baisu dengshi集沙門不應拜俗等事as an Example
摘要
在現代《大正新修大藏經》、《中華大藏經》等漢文佛教藏經的編纂過程中，部分學者已經注意到不同刻版的經典之間存在著異文出入的現象，但研究佛教藏經版本系統及其源流的專業學者幾乎無人給予適當的關注。本文在前人對於漢文佛教藏經典籍之版式、裝幀、經典分卷及其所繫帙號的差異等外部判別的文獻學描述基礎上，透過直接對不同版本的佛經語料進行文字內容的查索與比對，系統性地分析特定經本的諸藏異文出入，進行不同藏經版本之間源流關係的實證性考辨工作。本文主要以目前僅存三卷的《金藏》廣勝寺本《集沙門不應拜俗等事》為中心，藉由對勘其他諸藏所收錄之相應內容，標示出四種不同的異文類型，而能夠從藏經的內部線索進一步分析，探索它們之間可能存在的一些源流關係。
並列摘要
In the process of editing the contemporary Chinese Buddhist canons, namely the Taishō Tripiṭaka and the Tripitaka Sinica, scholars have already started paying attention to the existence of variant readings of sūtras found in various woodblock print editions. However, almost none of the researchers who study the system of canon editions and their origins have given due attention to this phenomenon. This paper builds on the bibliographical analysis by previous scholarship of differences between Chinese canons with respect to external aspects such as formatting, case binding and sūtra chapter division. Taking this work as a basis, the paper carries out an empirical study of the origins of different versions of the canons by means of a direct comparison between the textual contents of certain sūtras, as well as a systematic analysis of the differences between variant readings in specific sūtra versions. The paper mainly focuses on the three fascicles long Ji shamen buying baisu dengshi集沙門不應拜俗等事 (＂Śramaṇas Should not Bow to Laity and Related Matters＂) in the Jin Canon金藏found at Guangsheng Temple廣勝寺. Through the collation of corresponding texts found in different canons, this study shows the existence of four kinds of variant readings and explores the possible connections between them through further analysis of clues found within the canons.
參考文獻
延伸閱讀
- 宋惠如（2022）。On Nakai Riken's Argument Concerning the Loss of Confucius' Chunqiu and the Exegetical Method Used in His Zuozhuan fengyuan｜L'argument de Nakai Riken concernant la disparition du Chunqiu de Confucius et son exégèse du Zuozhuan fengyuan｜中井履軒における孔子『春秋』亡逸説及び『左伝逢原』経解について｜Nakai Rikens Argumente für den Verlust von Konfuzius' Chunqiu und seine exegetische Methode in Zuozhuan fengyuan。清華學報，52(3)，507-550。https://doi.org/10.6503/THJCS.202209_52(3).0003
- 陳偉強（2022）。＂Gods Protecting My Physical Form＂ and Pacing the Void in the Jade Capital: Li Bai's Poetics of the Banished Transcendent｜Les dieux protégeant ma forme physique, je marchais dans le vide à la capitale de Jade: La poétique du transcendant banni sur terre Li Bai｜眾神護形、歩虚玉京－李白謫仙詩の詩学｜＂Götter, die meine körperliche Gestalt beschützen＂ und in der Jade-Hauptstadt durch die Leere gehen: Li Bais Poetik des verbannten Transzendenten。清華學報，52(4)，675-715。https://doi.org/10.6503/THJCS.202212_52(4).0002
- 徐泓（2018）。Annotation and Textual Criticism to the Chapter ＂Toward the Pax Sinica in the Reign of Emperors of Ren and Xuan(仁宣致治)＂ in Ming shi ji shi ben mo(明史紀事本末)。東吳歷史學報，(38)，95-173。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=10250689-201806-201812210007-201812210007-95-173
- 李玉珍（2014）。The Physical Basis in the Dissemination of the Lotus Belief (Fahua Xinyang法華信仰): the Worship of Texts in Accounts of the Propagation and Praise of the Lotus [Sutra] (Hongzan fahua zhuan弘贊法華傳)。臺灣宗教研究，13(1)，5-27。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000594-201406-202108180011-202108180011-5-27
- 林欣慧（2019）。麥生本系統《源氏物語》的校訂態度－由初音卷與胡蝶卷中與玉鬘相關的描寫觀之－｜The Position on the Revision of The Tale of Genji in the Case of the Version Represented by Munyuubon: According to the Description About Tamakazura in Hatune Volume and Kotyou Volume。台大日本語文研究，(38)，55-73。https://doi.org/10.6183/NTUJP.201912_(38).0003