透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.141.198.146
  • 期刊
  • OpenAccess

電腦與紙筆測驗施測受刑人之比較研究-以桃園監獄為例

The Comparison of Administering Computerized Tests and Paper-and Pencil Test Assessing to the Inmates: Taoyuon Jail as an Example

摘要


現行監所超額收容與專業人員不足窘境下,惟有透過客觀、科學化之電腦施測,才能有效解決監所專業人力缺乏困境及外界對測驗品質疑慮。測驗電腦化除能有效控制施測情境、無須專業人員進行施測外,更有節省紙張浪費、提升行政效能等優勢。本研究之目的即在於評估以電腦化測驗取代紙筆測驗之可行性。研究對象為民國100年至102年三年期間新入監之受刑人,紙筆測驗有996人而其中有625人也做電腦測驗。主要發現如下:(1)電腦測驗較紙筆測驗節省25%施測時間,若加入人工登錄延宕時間,則節省99%的時間;(2)收容人問卷調查結果顯示:有68%的受刑人希望使用電腦測驗,有5%的受刑人希望使用紙筆測驗,有27%的受刑人對兩種形式皆能接受。本研究之結論為紙筆測驗可改為電腦測驗,符合節約人力、物力、時間成本之原則,但是電腦軟硬體採購成本和空間配置,會是行政實施之困難處。建議可從局部實驗性質漸近發展為務實做法。

並列摘要


The purpose of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of administering computerized test and paper-and-pencil (p-p) test in assessing the psychological traits of the inmates. Nine hundred and ninety-six inmates were administered the paper-and-pencil test, and 625 of them were also administered the computerized test. Their psychological traits were measured by interest test and personality test. The findings were: (1) The testing time of computerized test comparing to p-p test were saved up to 25% and even more to 99% if delaying encoding time was also included. (2) There were 68% of the inmates preferred to use computerized test, and 5% of them preferred to muse p-p, and 27% of them can accept both formats. In conclusion, there is possibility to replace the p-p test by computerized test in order to save time and budget. However, the cost of installment of hardware and software should be also considered. The small scale experiment could be one of the possibilities.

延伸閱讀