透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.159.229

摘要


Using panel data from Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS), this paper verifies that the variance of subject well being in different regions of China is high up to 23 percent. Further exploring indicate that the variance can not be explained by the offset effects of wage, rent and the expectation of higher social class, based on the spatial equilibrium theory framework. The reason of inter-region subject well being variance is up to be found.

參考文獻


Becker, Gary S. and Luis Rayo (2008). “Comments on ‘Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox'.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1):88-95, Spring.
Benjamin, Daniel J., Ori Heffetz, Miles S. Kimball, and Alex Rees-Jones (2011). “What Do You Think Would Make You Happier? What Do You Think You Would Choose?” American Economic Review 102(5): 2083-2110, August.
Daly, Mary C., Andrew J. Oswald, Daniel Wilson, and Stephen Wu (2011), “Dark contrasts: The paradox of high rates of suicide in happy places.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 80(3): 435-442, December.
Di Tella, Rafael, Robert J. MacCulloch, and Andrew J. Oswald (2001). “Preferences Over Inflation and Unemployment: Evidence from Surveys of Happiness.” American Economic Review 91(1):335-341, March.
D Kahneman, AB Krueger, D Schkade, N Schwarz, AA Stone; Would You Be Happier If You Were Richer? A Focusing Illusion., 《Science》, 2006, 312(5782):1908.

延伸閱讀


國際替代計量