電廠系統污染泡制度分析與成本有效性評估-以氮氧化物為例

Bubble strategy and cost benefit analysis of NOx abatement program for power

陳靖玟(jing-wen chen)

指導教授 ： 鄭福田

國立臺灣大學/工學院/環境工程學研究所/碩士(2005年)

https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2005.00920

摘要

高高屏地區由於工業、交通與人口之密集，其懸浮微粒PM10與臭氧(O3)的污染為台灣地區最嚴重者，由於氮氧化物為此兩種污染物之前趨物，故在高高屏地區氮氧化物之管制為一刻不容緩之任務。傳統之污染管制制度並不能有效的改善該地區之空氣污染品質，故採用先進之思維與措施勢在必行，根據先進國家之研究與施行，污染泡制度或將成為確實可行之方式；其主要將傳統之管制方式，改變為整體性、區域性的管理方式，讓工廠污染排放改善或減低計畫更具彈性，只要在該區域內所排放之污染量符合政府規定的總量上限，其中的任何工廠，可採取任何污染控制策略或措施。
故本研究分析後發現以下結論：
1.南部電廠不需減量即有多餘之排放量可提供他廠使用。
2.不管是否以三廠為一污染泡均無法達到BACT之排放量標準，故為達到BACT之標準排放量減量策略之執行是勢在必行之措施，尤以興達電廠為首要目標。
3.利用該減量策略使其達成BACT之排放標準，於模式模擬結果顯示，將有助於高高屏地區空氣品質之改善。若考量人口分佈，則以高雄縣之鳳山市以及高雄市之三民區有明顯改善之成效。
4.分析污染泡制度執行後，各減量策略於成本上均有或多或少之獲益，最多甚至可節省將近20%之成本花費。

關鍵字

污染泡 ； 成本效益分析 ； 氮氧化物 ； ISC模式 ； 最佳可行控制技術

並列摘要

Based on the growth of economic development, the air pollution is one of the serious environmental issues in the Kaoping area, especially PM10 and O3. Because NOx is the precursor of those produced, the controlling strategies of NOx will be very significant. However, the traditional pollution controlling policy cannot improve the air quality successfully so that a new and practical method will be necessary. From the experiences of the industry countries, the Bubble would be a suitable ways to overcome the situation. It would mainly focus on the regional management of air pollution, not the traditional strategy, and it would give factories more flexible practices to reduce pollution until the acceptable emission for the regulations. The research would follow the strategy to evaluate the NOx emission controlling of the power plant around the Kaoping area, and the study result would be following:
1.The power plants in the area have extra emission quota for other emission, and it is not necessary to reduce the emission.
2.The emissions, no matter the three in one or one by one, would not following the requirement of BACT, so that the reducing of emission would be necessary, especially Shinda power plant.
3.The modeling simulation would show that the strategies following the BACT would be successful for the air quality improvement. Moreover, the Fonsan city in the Kaoshiung county and Sanmin Area in the Kaoshiung city would have more huge improve for the consideration of population.
4.For the practice of Bubble strategy, the costs for the air pollution control would have obviously reducing, even 20% cost-saving.

並列關鍵字

Bubble ； benefit-cost analysis ； NOx ； ISC ； BACT

參考文獻

35.林春利、白玨玲、程萬里，2001，台中火力發電廠硫氧化物排放檢量對中部地區空品之討論，第十七屆空氣污染控制技術研討會論文集。

4.Levin, H.，1987，Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analyses，New Directions for Program Evaluation（34）：pp83-99.

5.De Vere, D.，1992，The Congressional Budget Office: An emphasis on cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis，New Directions for Program Evaluation（55）：pp97-104.

6.Cooper, C. &. Alley, F.，1996，Air Pollution Control-A Design Approach.

9.Erkut, E. and Verter, V.，1995，A Framework for Hazardous Materials Transport Risk Assessment，Risk Analysis(15)： pp589-601