透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.216.32.116
  • 學位論文

台灣保護動物法制之演進-探索法律對動物管制或保護之歷史

Evolution of Animal Protection Legal system in Taiwan-Exploring the History of Controlling or Protecting Animal by Law

指導教授 : 王泰升

摘要


由於動物保護法的制定,在台灣的動物保護法制已然成形,然而其被制定的背景為何?是否來自於台灣自身的社會運動?抑或有其他因素推動?箇中緣由乃是本文最終欲尋求之答案。 隨著歷史的演進,人類對待動物的方式發生了改變,借鏡西方,從最早將動物視為財產、工具化的對待,到開始試圖人道地對待動物,可看出人類想法的改變。隨後出現的環境保育概念,更讓人類為了整體環境著想地開始保護野生動物,最終乃是動物保護概念的逐漸成形。但在深受漢民族文化影響的台灣,過往的漢民族法律文明中是否有過與動物相關的規範?藉由觀察傳統中國與動物相關的諸般官府規定,試圖去窺見過往是否也有過保護動物的概念。 台灣土地經歷了數政權的統治,其不同的法規範與動物相關的的制定原因為何?在清帝國統治之後,隨之而來的日本政府為台灣帶來了新型態的法規範-現代型法律,其中與動物相關者甚多,立法目的也都各異,並開始出現了保護野生動物的法規。而中華民國法制在台施行後,卻出現了立法上的落差,雖有行政措施彌補,卻難以掩蓋保護動物法制立法腳步上的遲滯與被動。

並列摘要


Due to the legislation of animal protection law, the animal protection legal system had been formed in Taiwan, however, what is the background of the legislation? Was it pushed by Taiwan’s local social activities or other factors? The reason of the legislation is the answer I want to purchase. As time goes on, the way people treat animals changed, take western history for example, from regarding animals as property and treating them instrumentally to trying to treat them with humanity, we could see the change of human thoughts. After that, the idea of environmental protection had shown up, and made human to bear in mind the interest of whole environment then started to protect wild animals, finally the idea of animal protection had been formed. However, Taiwan is deeply affected by the culture of Han nationality, so was there any government rules about animals in the legal civilization of Han nationality? By observing those government rules about animals in traditional China, I try to find out the existence of the idea of animal protection. Taiwan had been governed by several different regimes, and what was the reason of those different regulations about animals had been formed? After the governance of Ching dynasty, the coming Japanese government brought Taiwan the new type of regulations - modern law, in that legal system, many laws are related to animals, each one of them had different legislative goals, and in that period of time, the laws about protecting wild animals started to be legislated. But after the legal system of R.O.C. started to be executed in Taiwan, the legislative gap appeared, even the R.O.C. government took lots of administrative measures to make up, it still hard to cover the slow and passive step of building the animal protection legal system.

參考文獻


台灣省政府農林廳,《台灣畜牧獸醫事業》(台北:台灣省政府農林廳,1981年)
台灣省政府農林廳,《台灣畜牧獸醫事業養牛編》(台北:台灣省政府農林廳,1984年)
英國世界動物保護協會及生而自由基金會,《動物園的真相》(台北:台灣動物社會研究會,2003年1月)
洪英聖,《台灣先住民腳印》(台北市:時報文化出版企業股份有限公司,1994年10月)
曹永和,《台灣早期歷史研究》(台北:聯經事業出版公司,1995年11月)

被引用紀錄


王家玉(2016)。我國動物福利觀點的動物保護法建構〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201600405
麥錦萱(2013)。苗栗農村小型食肉目動物被獵捕之現況〔碩士論文,國立屏東科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6346/NPUST.2013.00028
林祐立(2013)。農場動物福利之實然與應然-以我國法制之檢討分析為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.10921
吳思瑤(2013)。台北市動物保護政策之政經分析(1953-2013)〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2013.01073
劉瑤君(2012)。敖幼祥《烏龍院》系列漫畫之研究-以社會批判為中心〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315274917

延伸閱讀