論性犯罪者處遇與社會復歸問題

對本文而言，一個理想的社會，便應該是一個具有包容性的社會，對於犯罪者的處遇，除了確立再犯預防、社會防衛的功能以外，理應也兼顧犯罪者的社會復歸任務。關於犯罪者處遇與其復歸社會的議題，其中可探討之處相當廣泛且龐雜，而由於性犯罪者的處遇，存在著高度社會防衛需求的特性，因此本文的主要目的便在於，即使在這樣的境地裡，思考是否仍有可能為性犯罪者的社會復歸，尋求一絲不同的可能。本文先透過比較法了解美國與加拿大回應性犯罪時的處遇方式與態度，以此作為探究我國性犯罪者處遇問題時的參考，接著，在理論層面上，論證社會復歸在性犯罪處遇中的重要性，並藉由反思社會復歸中的家父長主義，建構出社會復歸與犯罪者處遇的內涵與定位。最後，在梳理目前我國的性犯罪處遇內容與面臨的相關困境後，則進一步探究性犯罪法庭與 COSA 作為社會復歸實踐途徑的可能性，及其在我國是否有適用的空間，並以 COSA 為主題，簡單的做政策設計上的評析與檢討，期能為我國處遇措施帶來一點新的啟發與靈感。

關鍵字

社會包容；社會復歸；良善生活模式；性犯罪；犯罪者處遇；家父長主義；性犯罪法庭；「支持與當責小組」(Circle of Support and Accountability ； COSA)

並列摘要

This article claims that an ideal society should be inclusive. In addition to establishing the functions of recidivism prevention and social defense, the treatment of offenders should also take into account the rehabilitation of offenders. The issue about the treatment of offenders and their rehabilitation are quite extensive and complex, and at the same time, since the treatment for sex offenders usually requires a high degree of social defense, the main purpose of this article is to try to think about whether it is still possible for sex offenders to rehabilitate to society and seek a different possibility even in such a situation. First of all, this article tries to understand the methods and attitudes of the United States and Canada in responding to sex offence. Then, this article demonstrates the importance of rehabilitation in the treatment of offenders, and constructs the meaning of rehabilitation through the reflection on the paternalism in rehabilitation. Last, after sorting out the current content and the dilemmas of the treatment for sex offenders in Taiwan, this article then explores the possibility of sex offence courts and COSA as a practical approach to rehabilitation, and try to figure out whether there is a room for application in Taiwan.

並列關鍵字

Social Inclusion ； Rehabilitation ； Good Life Model ； Sex Offence ； Treatment of Offenders ； Paternalism ； Sex Offence Court ； Circle of Support and Accountability(COSA)