透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.217.228.35
  • 學位論文

警察行政調查之研究-以警察職權行使法第十四條為中心

A Study of the Police Administrative Investigation-Focus on Article 14 of the Police Authority Performing Act

指導教授 : 林明鏘 王兆鵬

摘要


依據警察職權行使法第十四條,警察得通知人民到場調查,性質應為警察之行政調查,係指警察要求特定人於特定時間至特定地點報到,而對其進行調查、蒐集資訊之國家行為。而警察通知人民到場調查並非僅為警察行政調查、蒐集人民資訊之手段,更重要者,其中應包含對人民程序參與權之重要保障。使人民參與調查其資訊之程序,不但能保障人民之權利,亦得使警察所蒐集之資料獲得更趨於完整。並且,在警察通知人民到場之範疇內,警察通知人民到場調查,對人民基本權利產生干預,例如人身自由、資訊自決權及隱私權,故應有法律之明文規定,亦應有不自證己罪原則之適用。因此,本文擬將憲法原則加以具體化,明確提出警察通知人民到場調查之基本原則,且提出適當之要件,以此檢討現行警察職權行使法第十四條之規定,並對日後修法提出具體的建議,建構我國警察職權行使法中通知人民到場調查之制度。

並列摘要


According to Article 14 of the Police Authority Performing Act, the police are entitled to ask citizens to be present for investigation. Such regulation empowers the police to ask a particular citizen to be present for duty at a specific time and place, and it belongs to the administrative investigation power of the police. Based on the authorization of the country, the police can, under certain circumstances, question citizens and collect relevant information. However, asking citizens to be present should not be seen simply as a means to the police’s investigation and information collection, rather, it should embody the protection of the rights of citizens’ participation. Such participation not only can protect the rights of citizens, but also can assist the police’s investigation. In addition, although the police are entitled to ask citizens to be present, such acts would inevitably infringe citizens’ rights, such as freedom of movement, right to informational self-determination, and right to privacy, and thus should be proclaimed in the law and should apply to the principle of the privilege against self-incrimination. The aim of this paper is to reify the constitutional principles into applicable conditions of the investigations in which citizens are requested to be present. This paper will review the current regulations and conclude by generating concrete suggestions regarding the future revision of such law in order to improve the implementation of Article 14 of the Police Authority Performing Act.

參考文獻


湯德宗,『行政程序法論』,元照出版公司,2000年11月。
王兆鵬,「論新修刑訴之證人不自證己罪」,台大法學論叢,34卷1期,2005年1月。
陳新民,「論憲法人民基本權利之限制」,『憲法基本權利之基本理論(上)』,作者自版,四版,1996年1月。
林明鏘,「警察臨檢與行政程序」,台灣本土法學雜誌,35期,2002年6月。
林鈺雄,「被告地位之形成」,台灣本土法學雜誌,2期,1996年6月。

被引用紀錄


楊宗灝(2016)。電子遊戲場業管理法制面與實施面之探究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201700007
李可文(2012)。行政調查之研究-從2009年臺北市政府消保官抽驗速食業者用油案談起〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.02316
黃雅芬(2016)。論行政調查適用證據排除法則問題之研究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201614064207

延伸閱讀