近三十年來,世界各政府因為財政赤字持續擴大、公共建設財源不足,開始摸索並嘗試使用各類型的民間參模式,期望能分擔國家基礎建設之壓力、帶動國內需求,進而幫助國家經濟成長。 在完全自償之公共建設日漸飽和的情況下,對不具財務自償性或是自償性不高之公共建設,PFI(Private Finance Initiative)模式所具有之財務融通效果,則是其重大誘因,我國官方將PFI譯為「民間融資提案」,財政部將PFI定義為「由民間機構籌資並負責公共建設之興建、營運,政府於營運期間購買該建設之一部或全部之公共服務,並依契約約定機制辦理付費」。 然後國內相關法規及VfM之相關配套措施仍待研擬及建構,本研究目的係彙整國內外相之關案例成功及失敗因素,並對國內曾應用PFI模式之相關單位,進行之個案訪談,期望本結果能作為未來相關制度研擬與立法上之政策建議。
The Private Finance Fnitiative (PFI) is a way of creating " Public–Private Partnerships " (PPPs) by funding public infrastructure projects with private capital. For public construction that does not have financial self-compensation or low self-compensated, PFI (Private Finance Initiative) is an attractive model. However, relevant regulations and supporting measures in Taiwan are still under development and construction. The purpose of this study is to collate the success and failure factors of relevant domestic and foreign cases. Interviews with relevant public sectors in Taiwan that have tried to use the PFI model have been conducted. It is expected that this result will serve as a policy recommendation for future research and legislative development.