透過您的圖書館登入
IP:13.59.154.143
  • 學位論文

臺灣大學圖書館與首爾大學圖書館學科服務與學科館員比較研究

A Comparative Study of the Subject Service and Subject Librarians: Between The National Taiwan University Library and Seoul National University Library

指導教授 : 王梅玲

摘要


大學圖書館是大學的重要組成部分,是大學內的一個文化載體和場所,是在校學生課程之外的課外活動,是師生獲得資訊及知識的重要機構,是師生開展專業學習和科學研究的重要基地,是大學實現教育功能的重要渠道。 學科服務是一種深刻、專業化、首創新資訊服務,隨著圖書館學科服務內容的深化、服務範圍擴大、服務重心的拓展,學科服務的重心逐步從最初的傳播到深度的服務項目。對臺灣與韓國而言,除了少數大學圖書館外,對學科服務的認知度本身就很低,提供高完成度學科服務的大學圖書館並不多。臺灣大學圖書館和首爾大學圖書館是代表各國的大學圖書館,是在兩國最早引進學科服務的大學圖書館之一,也是提供優秀學科服務的大學圖書館。 本研究是以深度訪談與內容分析方式,探討臺灣大學圖書館與首爾大學圖書館學科服務與學館員的情形,並比較兩個大學圖書館的異同。本研究共得結論:(1)臺灣大學圖書館學科服務組織功能、學科館員任務、知能培育;(2)首爾大學圖書館學科服務組織功能、學科館員任務、知能培育;(3)臺灣大學圖書館與首爾大學圖書館學科服務模式與學科館員制度的異同;(4)學科服務對提高大學圖書館的服務品質產生正面影響;(5)學科館員的學科主題背景並不是必備因素;(6)臺灣大學圖書館與首爾大學圖書館皆未提供專門學科館員培訓課程;(7)臺灣大學圖書館與首爾大學圖書館引進學科服務的背景及發展歷程極其類似,但現今已各自發展出不同的面貌;(8)臺灣大學圖書館與首爾大學圖書館之間,無存在因不同國家而呈現明顯的差異;(9)重做學科專家還是屈居學科聯絡館員?;(10)本研究與國內相關研究之差別。

並列摘要


The university library is an important part of the university. This is a cultural carrier and place within the university, and an extracurricular activity outside the school curriculum, moreover an important institution for teachers and students to acquire information and knowledge. In addition an important base for teachers and students to carry out professional study and scientific research, furthermore an important channel for universities to realize its educational function. Subject service is a deep, specialized and innovative information service. As the content of library subject service deepens, the scope of service expands and the service center expands, the emphasis of subject service gradually spreads from the original to the deep. For Taiwan and South Korea, apart from a few university libraries, The cognition of subject services is low in itself, and there are not many university libraries offering high-finished subject services. The National Taiwan University Library and the Seoul National University Library are representative of each country, one of the first to introduce academic services in each countries, and also a university library to provide excellent academic services. The research is conducted in depth interview and content analysis method to explore the similarities and differences between National Taiwan University Library and Seoul National University Library Subject service and Subject librarian. This study concludes: (1) Duties, competence and training of subject librarians and the organizational role of subject service in the National Taiwan University Library; (2) Duties, competence and training of subject librarians and the organizational role of subject service in the Seoul National University Library; (3) The commonalities and differences between the the subject service management model and the subject librarian system of the National Taiwan University Library and the Seoul National University Library; (4) The Subject services have a positive effect on improving the quality of service in the university libraries; (5) The subject background of the subject librarian is not a necessary element; (6) The National Taiwan University Library and the Seoul National University Library do not provide professional education for subject librarian training; (7) The National Taiwan University Library and the Seoul National University Library have very similar backgrounds and development processes, but they have shown different developments in recent years; (8) There is no obvious differences due to their national differences between the National Taiwan University Library and the Seoul National University Library; (9) Working yourself up to being a subject specialist or being complacent as a liaison librarian?; (10) Differences between this study and domestic correlation studies.

參考文獻


王梅玲 (2005)。英美與亞太地區圖書資訊學教育。臺北市:文華。
王梅玲、謝寶煖 (2014)。圖書資訊學導論。 臺北市:五南。
王雪韻、王秀平 (2011)。高校圖書館建立學科館員制度的探討。中華醫學圖書情報雜誌,20(4),7-8。doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3982.2011.04.003
王貴海 (2012)。學科館員2.0與學科館員1.0的比較研究。圖書館學刊,2012年 01,136-138。
任吉剛、李曉紅、李鳳俠 (2015)。中美大學圖書館學科館員制度的比較分析及其啓示。中華醫學圖書資訊雜誌,(6),20-23。

延伸閱讀