2007年台灣老年人口突破總人數的10%,可見老年人口成長之快速。而內政部提出的促參方案雖有鼓勵民間投資興建之意,卻將社會福利資源作兩極化分配,讓高收入與低收入之高齡者受惠,卻使得佔多數的中所得老人無法享用社會福利,顯然有失公平正義。目前推動方案實務執行面已產生問題,已經停止試辦,可見此推動方案與住宅政策有其檢討之必要性。 本研究範疇以公辦民營與民間自行經營的老人住宅為例,運用深入訪談法從民間、政府與學術領域進行交叉影響分析,就政府與民間的資源、相關制度及法規政策深入探討。 研究的重要發現如下:(1)銀髮族住宅產業已有民間投資,但其投資獲利原則與老人福利的社會公益目的背道而馳;(2)都會區的銀髮住宅易將醫療、保健、福利與營建等體系串連。於政府部門的建議:(1)重新檢討高齡者住宅的供需評估系統;(2)將高齡者住宅納入住宅法系與整體住宅政策考量;(3)釋出更多的獎勵優惠以提高民間參與之意願;(4)善用都市更新與變更使用手法,開發社區老人住宅。給予民間經營者之建議:(1)創新的服務模式比硬體設施更為重要;(2)應考量整體生活圈內老人照顧體系,健全轉介服務制度。以達永續經營之效及在地老化的目標。
The population of the elder exceeds 10% in 2007, in which we can learn the fast growing. Project of promote nongovernmental participation brought up by DOI encouraged to invest constructions but allocated the Social Security resource into two extremities. To put it differently, it benefited the elders with low income and high income; however, most elders with middle income could not share the welfare. Obviously, it lost the justice. At present, the implement of the project had encountered problem and already stopped trial. As a result, it is necessary to review the promoting project and housing policy. This research takes the examples of the aged residence conducted. Using in-depth interview, analyzing intersection effect from three fields — folks, government, and academia, it has a thorough exploration based on government and private resources, relative systems, active policies and laws. Important discoveries in this research are as follows, 1.The folks have already invested in aged residence industry, but their principle is to make profits, instead of eldercare of Social Security. 2.The potential market of aged residence is large in the future. It is better to provide various choices of house types. Suggestion to governments 1.To review the supply-demand system of aged residence all over again. 2.To subsume aged residence into the strategy of housing. 3.Contribute more inspiring advantage to raise non-government participation. 4.To develop the aged residence community by urban regeneration. Suggestion to non-government 1.Brand-new service model is more important than hardware facilities. 2.To get the transferring service system healthy and thinking the whole eldercare life circle. Achieves the goal of sustainable management and aging in the current place can prolong the time of the elderly people peaceful caring at home.