從工程施工查核結果探討公共工程施工管理與品質管理制度問題

According to the Public Construction Surveillance Results to Discuss the Construction Management and Quality Control Management System

林岳勳(Yueh-Hsun Lin)

指導教授 ： 林利國

國立臺北科技大學/工程學院/土木與防災研究所/碩士(2013年)

https://doi.org/10.6841/NTUT.2013.00774

摘要

行政院公共工程委員會頒行推動「公共工程施工品質管理制度」及依政府採購法要求確保公共工程施工成果符合其設計及規範之品質要求，制訂「公共工程施工品質管理作業要點」，並進行工程施工查核作業已有一段時間，從臺北市政府96年至101年間施工查核執行結果看到，整體平均分數80.38分，細分下工程規模達5000萬以上工程查核成績較好平均有81.79分，最差的是工程規模較小之100萬以上未達1000萬之工程平均分數為78.1分；工程屬工程權責機關辦理的工程平均查核分數較高可達80.88分以上，而非屬工程權責單位則低於80分，工程類別屬專責工程捷運系統工程及自來水工程平均分數最高分別有85.04分及83.03分，較差的是一般性需求的裝（整）修工程及電機工程平均分數只有78.01分及79.03分。但以整體統計平均每件工程有18.68件次缺失，而依工程規模分類統計、依查核成績分類統計、依工程類別分類統計及依主管機關分別統計，都呈現出工程之查核缺失有集中發生在少數項目情況，所有類別均在發生缺失件次最高的前9項，缺失件次的累計均已超過20%；最高的前16項缺失件次的累計均已超過30%以上，這些缺失項目又是那些還是無法避免或是制度有問題是值得探討。再從施工查核件數與總在件工程件數之比較，以最高一年進行查核案件也只有155件，但相較6年於平均總在工程件數2239件只能佔6.92%，如此低之比例要如何使有限之施工查核發揮最大的效能，達到提升工程品質的目標也是值得探討。

關鍵字

工程施工查核

並列摘要

According to the Government Procurement Act, the Public Construction Commission promotes the quality control system to assure results of public works to conform their designs and specifications. The Public Construction Quality Control Guidelines had been formulated and operated for a while. From the results of the Taipei City Government monitoring their subordinate works, the overall average score is 80.38 points. According to the construction scale, more than 50 million NT dollars works had better score on average 81.79 points, the smaller works, more than 1 million NT dollars and less than 10 millions, had the worst average score of 78.1 points. The works handled by engineering authorities had higher score of 80.88 points on average and by non-engineering authorities had less than 80 points. The rapid transit works and drinking water works which were specially categories had the highest average score of 85.04 points and 83.03 points respectively, but ordinary repair works and electrical engineering only had average score of 78.01 points and 79.03 points. And the monitored works have 18.68 defects on average. Whatever according to the scale, monitored scores, categories, and project authorities, the defects were concentrated in a few items. The number of the defects accumulated by the front 9 items accounted for more than 20% of all and by the front 16 items accounted for more than 30%. The problems of whether could these defects be avoided or could the quality control system be improved are worth studying. Compared to the 2239 works in average every year, only 155 works were monitored, accounted for 6.92%, how to make a limited proportion of the construction monitoring maximum performance to enhance the quality of construction works is an valuable research in the future.

並列關鍵字

Public Construction Surveillance Results

參考文獻

1.行政院公共工程委員會，「公共工程品質管理訓練班教材」第一章公共工程施工品質管理制度之理念與導入。

2.行政院公共工程委員會，「工程施工查核小組組織準則」。

3.行政院公共工程委員會，「工程施工查核小組作業辦法」。

4.行政院公共工程委員會，「工程施工查核小組績效考核作業要點」。

5.行政院公共工程委員會，「工程施工查核小組96年度第4季查核件數統計總表」。